Reply to "How should decision aids be developed, and which patient outcomes should be assessed?"
- PMID: 35507239
- DOI: 10.1002/cncr.34246
Reply to "How should decision aids be developed, and which patient outcomes should be assessed?"
Comment on
-
Decision aids for localized prostate cancer in diverse minority men: Primary outcome results from a multicenter cancer care delivery trial (Alliance A191402CD).Cancer. 2022 Mar 15;128(6):1242-1251. doi: 10.1002/cncr.34062. Epub 2021 Dec 10. Cancer. 2022. PMID: 34890060 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
How should decision aids be developed, and which patient outcomes should be assessed?Cancer. 2022 Aug 1;128(15):2988-2989. doi: 10.1002/cncr.34247. Epub 2022 May 4. Cancer. 2022. PMID: 35507272 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Sanda MG, Cadeddu JA, Kirkby E, et al. Clinically localized prostate cancer: AUA/ASTRO/SUO guideline. Part I: risk stratification, shared decision making, and care options. J Urol. 2018;199:683-690. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2017.11.095
-
- Tilburt JC, Zahrieh D, Pacyna JE, et al. Decision aids for localized prostate cancer in diverse minority men: primary outcome results from a multicenter cancer care delivery trial (Alliance A191402CD). Cancer. 2022;128:1242-1251. doi:10.1002/cncr.34062
-
- Violette PD, Agoritsas T, Alexander P, et al. Decision aids for localized prostate cancer treatment choice: systematic review and meta-analysis. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015;65:239-251. doi:10.3322/caac.21272
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources