Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2022 May 4;12(5):e054787.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054787.

Deferred consent in emergency obstetric research: findings from qualitative interviews with women and recruiters in the ACROBAT pilot trial for severe postpartum haemorrhage

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Deferred consent in emergency obstetric research: findings from qualitative interviews with women and recruiters in the ACROBAT pilot trial for severe postpartum haemorrhage

Lorna Sweeney et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objective: The ACROBAT pilot trial of early cryoprecipitate for severe postpartum haemorrhage used deferred consent procedures. Pretrial discussions with a patient and public involvement group found mixed views towards deferred consent. This study aimed to build an understanding of how the deferred consent procedures worked in practice, to inform plans for a full-scale trial.

Setting: Qualitative interview study within a cluster-randomised pilot trial, involving four London maternity services.

Participants: Individual interviews were conducted postnatally with 10 women who had received blood transfusion for severe postpartum haemorrhage and had consented to the trial. We also interviewed four 'recruiters'-two research midwives and two clinical trials practitioners who conducted trial recruitment.

Results: Consent procedures in the ACROBAT pilot trial were generally acceptable and the intervention was viewed as low risk, but most women did not remember much about the consent conversation. As per trial protocol, recruiters sought to consent women before hospital discharge, but this time pressure had to be balanced against the need to ensure women were not approached when distressed or very unwell. Extra efforts had to be made to communicate trial information to women due to the exhaustion of their recovery and competing demands for their attention. Participant information was further complicated by explanations about the cluster design and change in transfusion process, even though the consent sought was for access to medical data.

Conclusion: Our findings indicate that deferred consent procedures raise similar concerns as taking consent when emergency obstetric research is occurring-that is, the risk that participants may conflate research with clinical care, and that their ability to process trial information may be impacted by the stressful nature of recovery and newborn care. A future trial may support more meaningful informed consent by extending the window of consent discussion and ensuring trial information is minimal and easy to understand.

Trial registration number: ISRCTN12146519.

Keywords: ETHICS (see Medical Ethics); HAEMATOLOGY; OBSTETRICS; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: The authors declare that they do not have any competing interests.

References

    1. Neary C, Naheed S, McLernon DJ, et al. . Predicting risk of postpartum haemorrhage: a systematic review. BJOG 2021;128:46–53. 10.1111/1471-0528.16379 - DOI - PubMed
    1. The medicines for human use (clinical trials) regulations, 2004. Available: www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2004/1031 [Accessed 24 Jan 2022]. - PubMed
    1. Kadam RA. Informed consent process: a step further towards making it meaningful! Perspect Clin Res 2017;8:107–12. 10.4103/picr.PICR_147_16 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kenyon S, Ewer A. Clinical governance advice no. 6a. 2. Obtaining Valid Consent to Participate in Perinatal Research Where Consent is Time Critical. London: Royal College of Obstetricians & Gynaecologists, 2016.
    1. Snowdon C, Elbourne D, Forsey M, et al. . Views of emergency research (vera): a qualitative study of women and their partners' views of recruitment to trials in severe postpartum haemorrhage. Midwifery 2012;28:800–8. 10.1016/j.midw.2011.11.009 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data