Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022:1364:227-250.
doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-91979-5_11.

Ultrasound Computed Tomography

Affiliations

Ultrasound Computed Tomography

Philippe Lasaygues et al. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2022.

Abstract

This chapter presents theoretical, numerical, and experimental frameworks for the use of Ultrasound Computed Tomography (USCT) for cortical bone tissue imaging. Most of the research conducted on this topic concerns adult bone, although some work presented in this chapter is specific to the study of child bone. USCT is recognized as a powerful method for soft tissue imaging. In bone imaging, the difficulties arise from the very high impedance contrast between tissues which alters the propagation of the ultrasonic waves and limits the linear inversion algorithms used. Solutions consist in optimally assessing non-linear effects in an iterative approach aiming at local linearization. When the problem can be reduced to the study of a fluid-like cavity buried in an elastic cylinder surrounded by water, the signal processing and/or compound algorithms can be added as an extension to the linear algorithms. The main limitation of these methods is the heavy experimental costs involved. We have then suggested the introduction of purely numerical non-linear full-waveform inversion algorithms. The performances and the limitations of these linear and non-linear methods applied to cortical bone tissue imaging problems are overviewed and discussed.

Keywords: Adapted inversion scheme; Cortical bone shell; Full waveform inversion; Ultrasound computed tomography.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. André, M. P., Duncan Craven, J., Greenfield, M. A., & Stern, R. (1980). Measurement of the velocity of ultrasound in the human femur in vivo. Medical Physics, 7(4), 324–330. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.594713 - DOI - PubMed
    1. André, M. P., Martin, P. J., Otto, G. P., Olson, L. K., Barrett, T. K., Spivey, B. A., & Palmer, D. A. (1995). A new consideration of diffraction computed tomography for breast imaging: Studies in phantoms and patients. In J. P. Jones (Ed.), Acoustical imaging (pp. 379–390). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1943-0_40 - DOI
    1. Bamberger, A., Chavent, G., Hemon, C., & Lailly, P. (1982). Inversion of normal incidence seismograms. GEOPHYSICS, 47(5), 757–770. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1441345 - DOI
    1. Belkebir, K., & Saillard, M. (2004). Testing inversion algorithms against experimental data: Inhomogeneous targets. Inverse Problems, 21(6), S1–S3. https://doi.org/10.1088/0266-5611/21/6/S01 - DOI
    1. Bernard, S., Monteiller, V., Komatitsch, D., & Lasaygues, P. (2017). Ultrasonic computed tomography based on full-waveform inversion for bone quantitative imaging. Physics in Medicine & Biology, 62(17), 7011–7035. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/aa7e5a - DOI