Improving birth certificate data accuracy in Alabama
- PMID: 35509413
- PMCID: PMC9059177
- DOI: 10.1002/hsr2.607
Improving birth certificate data accuracy in Alabama
Abstract
Objective: Accurate vital statistics data are critical for monitoring population health and strategizing public health interventions. Previous analyses of statewide birth data have identified several factors that may reduce birth certificate accuracy including systematic errors and limited data review by clinicians. The aim of this initiative was to increase the proportion of hospitals in Alabama reporting accurate birth certificate data from 67% to 87% within 1 year.
Methods: The Alabama Perinatal Quality Collaborative led this statewide collaborative effort. Process measures included monthly monitoring of 11 variables across 5-10 patient birth certificates per month per hospital. Accuracy determination, defined as ≥95% accuracy of the variables analyzed, was performed by health care specialists at each hospital by comparing birth certificate variables from vital statistics with data obtained from original hospital source materials. Three months of retrospective, baseline accuracy data were collected before project initiation from which actionable drivers and change ideas were identified at individual hospitals. Data were analyzed using statistical process control measures.
Results: Thirty-one hospitals entered data throughout the course of the initiative, accounting for 850 chart analyses and 9350 variable assessments. The least accurately reported variables included birth weight, maternal hypertension, and antenatal corticosteroid exposure. At baseline, 67% of hospitals reported birth certificate accuracy rates ≥ 95%, which increased to 90% of hospitals within 2 months and was sustained for the remainder of the initiative.
Conclusion: Statewide, multidisciplinary quality improvement efforts increased birth certificate accuracy vital to public health surveillance.
Keywords: birth certificate accuracy; data quality; perinatal quality collaborative; vital statistics.
© 2022 The Authors. Health Science Reports published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Optimizing accuracy of birth certificate data through a statewide quality improvement initiative in Illinois.J Perinatol. 2023 Nov;43(11):1440-1445. doi: 10.1038/s41372-023-01788-0. Epub 2023 Oct 2. J Perinatol. 2023. PMID: 37783851
-
Vital records for quality improvement.Pediatrics. 1999 Jan;103(1 Suppl E):278-90. Pediatrics. 1999. PMID: 9917471 Review.
-
Accuracy in Reporting of Kentucky Certified Nurse-Midwives as Attendants in Birth Registration Data.J Midwifery Womens Health. 2020 Sep;65(5):688-693. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.13111. Epub 2020 May 11. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2020. PMID: 32391962
-
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12. Early Hum Dev. 2020. PMID: 33036834
-
Examining interpregnancy intervals and maternal and perinatal health outcomes using U.S. vital records: Important considerations for analysis and interpretation.Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2019 Jan;33(1):O60-O72. doi: 10.1111/ppe.12520. Epub 2018 Oct 15. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2019. PMID: 30320453 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Gulersen M, Grunebaum A, Lenchner E, Chervenak FA, Bornstein E. Racial disparities in the administration of antenatal corticosteroids in women with preterm birth. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;223:933‐934. - PubMed
-
- Menacker F, Martin JA. Expanded health data from the new birth certificate, 2005. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2008;56:1‐24. - PubMed
-
- Zollinger TW, Przybylski MJ, Gamache RE. Reliability of Indiana birth certificate data compared to medical records. Ann Epidemiol. 2006;16:1‐10. - PubMed
-
- Roohan PJ, Josberger RE, Acar J, Dabir P, Feder HM, Gagliano PJ. Validation of birth certificate data in New York State. J Community Health. 2003;28:335‐346. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources