Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Mar 22;13(15):4372-4376.
doi: 10.1039/d2sc00111j. eCollection 2022 Apr 13.

Amplification of weak chiral inductions for excellent control over the helical orientation of discrete topologically chiral (M3L2) n polyhedra

Affiliations

Amplification of weak chiral inductions for excellent control over the helical orientation of discrete topologically chiral (M3L2) n polyhedra

Yuya Domoto et al. Chem Sci. .

Abstract

Superb control over the helical chirality of discrete (M3L2) n polyhedra (n = 2,4,8, M = CuI or AgI) created from the self-assembly of propeller-shaped ligands (L) equipped with chiral side chains is demonstrated here. Almost perfect chiral induction (>99 : 1) of the helical orientation of the framework was achieved for the largest (M3L2)8 cube with 48 small chiral side chains (diameter: ∼5 nm), while no or moderate chiral induction was observed for smaller polyhedra (n = 2, 4). Thus, amplification of the weak chiral inductions of each ligand unit is an efficient way to control the chirality of large discrete nanostructures with high structural complexity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflicts to declare.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. (a) Chemical structure of propeller-shaped ligand 1 and its P- and M-forms. Unless otherwise noted, the (S)-2-alkoxy isomers of 1b–e were used in the main study. (b) Schematic representation of the self-assembly of the (M3L2)n coordination polyhedra 2–4 (n = 2, 4, 8) with chiral side chains. Each assembly is formed by the oligomerization of n units of M3L2, a hypothetical intermediate stabilized by metal–acetylene π-coordination. Illustrations in the second column from the left were generated by combining 2-butoxy side chains (molecular-mechanics (MM) models) with polyhedral frameworks based on the reported crystal structures. Cartoon illustrations in the third column exhibit the entangled structures of the (M3L2)n polyhedra, while metal–acetylene π-coordination is omitted for clarity.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Self-assembly of complex 2b and tetrahedron 3b. Partial 1H NMR spectra of (a) ligand 1b (500 MHz, 300 K, CDCl3), (b) complex 2b (700 MHz, 300 K, CD3NO2), and (c) tetrahedron 3b (500 MHz, 300 K, toluene-d8). Red circles and blue triangles indicate two diastereomeric complexes, respectively. A 1H DOSY spectrum is shown in addition (for details, see Fig. S5†). (d) X-ray crystal structure of 2b; 2-butoxy chains are shown as space-filling models.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. Self-assembly of cube 4 with ligands that contain chiral side chains. (a) Schematic representation of the nitrate-templated self-assembly of 4 (depicted with R = 2-butoxy for simplicity); partial 1H NMR spectra (500 MHz, 287 K, CDCl3/CD3OD (94/6, v/v)) of ligand 1d and cube 4 showing (b) time-dependent redistribution of the diastereomers, (c) cube 4 with ligand 1d in CDCl3/CD3OD (97/3, v/v, t = 18 h), and (d) cube 4 with ligand 1b in CDCl3/CD3OD (97/3, v/v). (e) Changes in the CD (293 K, CHCl3/MeOH (94/6, v/v)) spectrum upon formation of cube 4d. (f) Changes in the CD (293 K, CHCl3/MeOH (97/3, v/v)) spectrum upon formation of cube 4b.

References

    1. Masamune S. Choy W. Petersen J. S. Sita L. R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1985;24:1–30. doi: 10.1002/anie.198500013. - DOI
    1. Okamoto Y. Mohri H. Nakano T. Hatada K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989;111:5952–5954. doi: 10.1021/ja00197a072. - DOI
    1. Green M. M. Andreola C. Muñoz B. Reidy M. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988;110:4063–4065. doi: 10.1021/ja00220a070. - DOI
    2. Green M. M. Peterson N. C. Sato T. Teramoto A. Cook R. Lifson S. Science. 1995;268:1860–1866. doi: 10.1126/science.268.5219.1860. - DOI - PubMed
    3. Nakako H. Nomura R. Masuda T. Macromolecules. 2001;34:1496–1502. doi: 10.1021/ma001812i. - DOI
    1. Yamada T. Nagata Y. Suginome M. Chem. Commun. 2010;46:4914–4916. doi: 10.1039/C001564D. - DOI - PubMed
    2. Nagata Y. Yamada T. Adachi T. Akai Y. Yamamoto T. Suginome M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013;135:10104–10113. doi: 10.1021/ja403391m. - DOI - PubMed
    3. Nagata Y. Nishikawa T. Suginome M. Sato S. Sugiyama M. Porcar L. Martel A. Inoue R. Sato N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018;140:2722–2726. doi: 10.1021/jacs.7b11626. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ousaka N. Clegg J. K. Nitschke J. R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2012;51:1464–1468. doi: 10.1002/anie.201107532. - DOI - PubMed
    2. Huang F. Ma L. Che Y. Jiang H. Chen X. Wang Y. J. Org. Chem. 2018;83:733–739. doi: 10.1021/acs.joc.7b02709. - DOI - PubMed
    3. Zhang J. Luo D. Ma C. Huang L. Gan Q. Nat. Commun. 2021;12:2659. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-22984-6. - DOI - PMC - PubMed