Can further subdivision of the Raymond-Roy classification of intracranial aneurysms be useful in predicting recurrence and need for future retreatment following endovascular coiling?
- PMID: 35509568
- PMCID: PMC9062957
- DOI: 10.25259/SNI_991_2021
Can further subdivision of the Raymond-Roy classification of intracranial aneurysms be useful in predicting recurrence and need for future retreatment following endovascular coiling?
Abstract
Background: The Raymond-Roy classification has been the standard for neck recurrences following endovascular coiling with three grades. Several modified classification systems with subdivisions have been reported in literature but it is unclear whether this adds value in predicting recurrence or retreatment. Our aim is to assess if these subdivisions aid in predicting recurrence and need for retreatment.
Methods: A retrospective review of all patients undergoing endovascular coiling between 2013 and 2014. Patients requiring stent assistance or other embolization devices were excluded from the study. The neck residue was graded at time of coiling on the cerebral angiogram and subsequent 6, 24, and 60 months MRA. Correlation between grade at coiling and follow-up with need for subsequent retreatment was assessed.
Results: Overall, 17/200 (8.5%) cases required retreatment within 5 years of initial coiling. 4/130 (3.1%) required retreatment within 5 years with initial Grade 0 at coiling, 6/24 cases (25%) of those Grade 2a, 4/20 cases (20%) Grade 2b, 3/8 (38%) Grade 3, and none of those with Grade 1. Large aneurysms ≥11 mm had an increased risk of aneurysm recurrence and retreatment. About 9.7% of ruptured aneurysms required retreatment versus 4.4% for unruptured. About 55% of carotid ophthalmic aneurysms were retreated.
Conclusion: Although the modified classification system was significantly predictive of progressive recurrence and need for retreatment, no significant difference between the subdivisions of Grade 2 was observed. Similar predictive value was seen when using the Raymond-Roy classification compared to the new modified, limiting the usefulness of the new system in clinical practice.
Keywords: Coiling; Intracranial aneurysms; Raymond-Roy; Recurrence.
Copyright: © 2022 Surgical Neurology International.
Conflict of interest statement
There are no conflicts of interest.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Predictors of success following endovascular retreatment of intracranial aneurysms.Interv Neuroradiol. 2015 Aug;21(4):426-32. doi: 10.1177/1591019915590070. Epub 2015 Jun 19. Interv Neuroradiol. 2015. PMID: 26092439 Free PMC article.
-
Recurrence, retreatment, and rebleed rates of coiled aneurysms with respect to the Raymond-Roy scale: a meta-analysis.J Neurointerv Surg. 2016 May;8(5):507-11. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-011668. Epub 2015 Apr 28. J Neurointerv Surg. 2016. PMID: 25921230
-
Initial Raymond-Roy Occlusion Classification but not Packing Density Defines Risk for Recurrence after Aneurysm Coiling.Clin Neuroradiol. 2021 Jun;31(2):391-399. doi: 10.1007/s00062-020-00926-x. Epub 2020 Jul 1. Clin Neuroradiol. 2021. PMID: 32613253 Free PMC article.
-
Residuals, recurrences and re-treatment after endovascular repair of intracranial aneurysms: A retrospective methodological comparison.Interv Neuroradiol. 2020 Feb;26(1):45-54. doi: 10.1177/1591019919867841. Epub 2019 Aug 12. Interv Neuroradiol. 2020. PMID: 31403834 Free PMC article.
-
Risk factors for angiographic recurrence after treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms: Outcomes from a series of 178 unruptured aneurysms treated by regular coiling or surgery.J Neuroradiol. 2017 Sep;44(5):298-307. doi: 10.1016/j.neurad.2017.05.003. Epub 2017 Jun 8. J Neuroradiol. 2017. PMID: 28602498 Review.
Cited by
-
Risk factors for repeated recurrence of cerebral aneurysms treated with endovascular embolization.Front Neurol. 2022 Sep 29;13:938333. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.938333. eCollection 2022. Front Neurol. 2022. PMID: 36247772 Free PMC article.
-
A 5-Year Follow-Up after Endovascular Treatment of 402 Intracranial Aneurysms-A Single-Centre Experience.Biomedicines. 2024 Jun 1;12(6):1231. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines12061231. Biomedicines. 2024. PMID: 38927438 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Becske T, Potts MB, Shapiro M, Kallmes DF, Brinjikji W, Saatci I, et al. Pipeline for uncoilable or failed aneurysms: 3-year follow-up results. J Neurosurg. 2017;127:81–8. - PubMed
-
- Byrne JV, Sohn MJ, Molyneux AJ, Chir B. Five-year experience in using coil embolization for ruptured intracranial aneurysms: Outcomes and incidence of late rebleeding. J Neurosurg. 1999;90:656–63. - PubMed
-
- Campi A, Ramzi N, Molyneux AJ, Summers PE, Kerr RS, Sneade M, et al. Retreatment of ruptured cerebral aneurysms in patients randomized by coiling or clipping in the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) Stroke. 2007;38:1538–44. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources