Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Apr 29:13:20406207221095226.
doi: 10.1177/20406207221095226. eCollection 2022.

Prednisone plus IVIg compared with prednisone or IVIg for immune thrombocytopenia in pregnancy: a national retrospective cohort study

Affiliations

Prednisone plus IVIg compared with prednisone or IVIg for immune thrombocytopenia in pregnancy: a national retrospective cohort study

Xiao-Lu Zhu et al. Ther Adv Hematol. .

Abstract

Background: The responses of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) or corticosteroids as the initial treatment on pregnancy with ITP were unsatisfactory. This study aimed to assess the safety and effectiveness of prednisone plus IVIg versus prednisone or IVIg in pregnant patients with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP).

Methods: Between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2020, 970 pregnancies diagnosed with ITP at 19 collaborative centers in China were reviewed in this observational study. A total of 513 pregnancies (52.89%) received no intervention. Concerning the remaining pregnancies, 151 (33.04%) pregnancies received an initial treatment of prednisone plus IVIg, 105 (22.98%) pregnancies received IVIg alone, and 172 (37.64%) pregnancies only received prednisone.

Results: Regarding the maternal response to the initial treatment, no differences were found among the three treatment groups (41.1% for prednisone plus IVIg, 33.1% for prednisone, and 38.1% for IVIg). However, a significant difference was observed in the time to response between the prednisone plus IVIg group (4.39 ± 2.54 days) and prednisone group (7.29 ± 5.01 days; p < 0.001), and between the IVIg group (6.71 ± 4.85 days) and prednisone group (p < 0.001). The median prednisone duration in the monotherapy group was 27 days (range, 8-195 days), whereas that in the combination group was 14 days (range, 6-85 days). No significant differences were found among these three treatment groups in neonatal outcomes, particularly concerning the neonatal platelet counts. The time to response in the combination treatment group was shorter than prednisone monotherapy. The duration of prednisone application in combination group was shorter than prednisone monotherapy. The combined therapy showed a lower predelivery platelet transfusion rate than IVIg alone.

Conclusion: These findings suggest that prednisone plus IVIg may represent a potential combination therapy for pregnant patients with ITP.

Keywords: immune thrombocytopenia; intravenous immunoglobulin; prednisone; pregnant.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest statement: The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Patient disposition. IVIg, intravenous immunoglobulin; rhTPO, recombinant human thrombopoietin.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Box plots of the time to response of patients with an initial response to prednisone plus IVIg, prednisone, or IVIg alone. The time to response in the prednisone plus IVIg group and IVIg alone group was significantly shorter than that in the prednisone alone group. No significant difference was found between the prednisone plus IVIg group and IVIg alone group.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Toltl LJ, Nazi I, Jafari R, et al.. Piecing together the humoral and cellular mechanisms of immune thrombocytopenia. Semin Thromb Hemost 2011; 37: 631–639. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gill KK, Kelton JG. Management of idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura in pregnancy. Semin Hematol 2000; 37: 275–289. - PubMed
    1. Sainio S, Kekomaki R, Riikonen S, et al.. Maternal thrombocytopenia at term: a population-based study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2000; 79: 744–749. - PubMed
    1. Cines DB, Blanchette VS. Immune thrombocytopenic purpura. N Engl J Med 2002; 346: 995–1008. - PubMed
    1. Eslick R, McLintock C. Managing ITP and thrombocytopenia in pregnancy. Platelets 2020; 31: 300–306. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources