Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2022 Oct;22(7):2546-2558.
doi: 10.1111/1755-0998.13630. Epub 2022 May 27.

Comparing genome-based estimates of relatedness for use in pedigree-based conservation management

Samantha S Hauser  1 , Stephanie J Galla  2   3 , Andrea S Putnam  4 , Tammy E Steeves  2 , Emily K Latch  1
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparing genome-based estimates of relatedness for use in pedigree-based conservation management

Samantha S Hauser et al. Mol Ecol Resour. 2022 Oct.

Abstract

Researchers have long debated which estimator of relatedness best captures the degree of relationship between two individuals. In the genomics era, this debate continues, with relatedness estimates being sensitive to the methods used to generate markers, marker quality, and levels of diversity in sampled individuals. Here, we compare six commonly used genome-based relatedness estimators (kinship genetic distance [KGD], Wang maximum likelihood [TrioML], Queller and Goodnight [Rxy ], Kinship INference for Genome-wide association studies [KING-robust), and pairwise relatedness [RAB ], allele-sharing coancestry [AS]) across five species bred in captivity-including three birds and two mammals-with varying degrees of reliable pedigree data, using reduced-representation and whole genome resequencing data. Genome-based relatedness estimates varied widely across estimators, sequencing methods, and species, yet the most consistent results for known first order relationships were found using Rxy , RAB , and AS. However, AS was found to be less consistently correlated with known pedigree relatedness than either Rxy or RAB . Our combined results indicate there is not a single genome-based estimator that is ideal across different species and data types. To determine the most appropriate genome-based relatedness estimator for each new data set, we recommend assessing the relative: (1) correlation of candidate estimators with known relationships in the pedigree and (2) precision of candidate estimators with known first-order relationships. These recommendations are broadly applicable to conservation breeding programmes, particularly where genome-based estimates of relatedness can complement and complete poorly pedigreed populations. Given a growing interest in the application of wild pedigrees, our results are also applicable to in situ wildlife management.

Keywords: allele-sharing; captive breeding; conservation breeding programme; ex situ management; relatedness; wild pedigrees.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Attard, C. R., Beheregaray, L. B., & Möller, L. M. (2018). Genotyping-by-sequencing for estimating relatedness in nonmodel organisms: Avoiding the trap of precise bias. Molecular Ecology Resources, 18(3), 381-390. https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.12739
    1. Ballou, J. D. (1983). Calculating inbreeding coefficients from pedigrees. In C. M. Schonewald-Cox, S. M. Chambers, B. MacBryde, & L. Thomas (Eds.), Genetics and conservation (pp. 509-20).
    1. Ballou, J., & Lacy, R. C. (1995). Identifying genetically important individuals for management of genetic variation in pedigreed populations. In J. D Ballou (Ed.), Population management for survival and recovery (pp. 76-111). Columbia University Press.
    1. Balloux, F., Amos, W., & Coulson, T. (2004). Does heterozygosity estimate inbreeding in real populations? Molecular Ecology, 13(10), 3021-3031. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2004.02318.x
    1. Baruch, E., & Weller, J. I. (2008). Estimation of the number of SNP genetic markers required for parentage verification. Animal Genetics, 39(5), 474-479. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2052.2008.01754.x

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources