Fundamental Care's state of knowledge around the world: Where are we now? A scoping review
- PMID: 35511714
- DOI: 10.1111/jan.15278
Fundamental Care's state of knowledge around the world: Where are we now? A scoping review
Abstract
Aims: To investigate and describe the current state of knowledge about Fundamental Care in terms of population, contexts, concepts and gaps.
Design: A scoping review.
Data sources: CINAHL, Medline, PsycINFO and EMBASE databases were searched in April 2021 for eligible literature, published from January 2010, onwards.
Review methods: This scoping review was built around the recommendations of Peters et al. (2020 version). Two researchers conducted the literature search, and three researchers independently screened the titles and abstracts of the retrieved studies' data, using the eligibility criteria and the review questions as a guide.
Results: The search yielded 763 records, of which 107 were included. Results are presented under seven subheadings: (a) Countries and Continents, (b) Context, (c) Research Design, (d) Publishing/Journal, (e) Participants and Population, (f) Keywords and (g) Fundamental of Care Framework and Practice Process. All the retrieved articles describe the current state of knowledge about Fundamental Care in terms of population, contexts, concepts and gaps.
Conclusion: This scoping review highlighted the elevated number of articles that have been published since the beginning of the work on Fundamental Care, 10 years ago. The included articles are related to different dimensions of research, practice and teaching and to the Fundamentals of Nursing Care, but also to nursing theory. Finally, most of the articles had a nursing focus.
Impact: The results of this scoping review allow us to highlight the work from the past 10 years. This may be of interest to learn more about the research surrounding Fundamental Care. This scoping review allows us to better target the theoretical and empirical developments to focus on in the coming years.
Keywords: Fundamental Care; Fundamentals of Care; International Learning Collaborative; Nurse; Nursing care; Scoping review.
© 2022 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Similar articles
-
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881. Med J Aust. 2020. PMID: 33314144
-
Methods, metrics and research gaps around minimum data sets for nursing practice and fundamental care: A scoping literature review.J Clin Nurs. 2018 Jun;27(11-12):2230-2247. doi: 10.1111/jocn.14155. Epub 2017 Dec 19. J Clin Nurs. 2018. PMID: 29119641
-
Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):14-26. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1694. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015. PMID: 26447004
-
Exploring conceptual and theoretical frameworks for nurse practitioner education: a scoping review protocol.JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):146-55. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2150. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015. PMID: 26571290
-
How fundamental aspects of nursing care are defined in the literature: A scoping review.J Clin Nurs. 2018 Jun;27(11-12):2189-2229. doi: 10.1111/jocn.14313. J Clin Nurs. 2018. PMID: 29514402
Cited by
-
Nursing practice in relation to older people's fundamentals of care in nursing homes: An exploratory design.Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2025 May 6;8:100346. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2025.100346. eCollection 2025 Jun. Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2025. PMID: 40491901 Free PMC article.
-
The Quality of Fundamental Care as Perceived by Nurses and Patients in a Hospital Setting: A Descriptive Comparative Study.Nurs Open. 2025 Apr;12(4):e70234. doi: 10.1002/nop2.70234. Nurs Open. 2025. PMID: 40263644 Free PMC article.
-
What about the fundamentals of nursing-its interventions and its continuity among older people in need of home- or facility-based care: a scoping review.BMC Nurs. 2024 Jan 22;23(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s12912-023-01675-1. BMC Nurs. 2024. PMID: 38254154 Free PMC article.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Amerson, R. M., & Strang, C. W. (2015). Addressing the challenges of conducting research in developing countries. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 47(6), 584-591. https://doi.org/10.1111/jnu.12171
-
- Arksey, H., & O'Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19-32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616
-
- Ausserhofer, D., Zander, B., Busse, R., Schubert, M., De Geest, S., Rafferty, A. M., Ball, J., Scott, A., Kinnunen, J., Heinen, M., Sjetne, I. S., Moreno-Casbas, T., Kozka, M., Lindqvist, R., Diomidous, M., Bruyneel, L., Sermeus, W., Aiken, L. H., & Schwendimann, R. (2014). Prevalence, patterns and predictors of nursing care left undone in European hospitals: Results from the multicountry cross-sectional RN4CAST study. BMJ Quality and Safety, 23(2), 126-135. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2013-002318
-
- Avallin, T., Muntlin Athlin, Å., Björck, M., & Jangland, E. (2020). Using communication to manage missed care: A case study applying the fundamentals of care framework. Journal of Nursing Management, 28, 2091-2102. https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.12963
-
- Bragadóttir, H., Kalisch, B. J., & Tryggvadóttir, G. B. (2017). Correlates and predictors of missed nursing care in hospitals. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 26(11-12), 1524-1534. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13449
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous