Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 May 5;12(1):7319.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-10751-6.

Grade group system and plasma androgen receptor status in the first line treatment for metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer

Affiliations

Grade group system and plasma androgen receptor status in the first line treatment for metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer

M C Cursano et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

In localized prostate cancer (PCa), Grade Group (GG) and Gleason Score (GS) have a well-established prognostic role. In metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), the prognostic role of GS and GG is less defined. In first-line treatment of mCRPC, androgen receptor (AR)-directed drugs (abiraterone acetate, enzalutamide) and docetaxel represent the referring options. There is no evidence that the GS/GG systems can add information to guide the choice between AR-directed drugs and docetaxel in the first-line setting of mCRPC. Nowadays there are no validated biomarkers, which define patients who may benefit or not from hormonal treatments or chemotherapy. Androgen receptor (AR) copy number variations (CNV) are predictive factors of poor response to abiraterone and enzalutamide. There are no available data about the association between AR CNV and GG. In this retrospective study, we analysed the association of the highest GG score with AR CNV and their impact on the clinical outcome of AR-directed drugs and docetaxel as first-line therapy for mCRPC patients. Patients benefit from docetaxel, abiraterone or enzalutamide regardless the GG. However, the presence of GG5 and AR CNV gain identifies a subgroup of patients with poor prognosis, which could benefit from front-line docetaxel instead of AR-directed drugs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

U. De Giorgi has received personal fees for advisory board/consultancy from Astellas, Bayer, BMS, Ipsen, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi. V.Conteduca has received speaker honoraria or travel support from Astellas, Janssen-Cilag, and Sanofi-Aventis, and has received consulting fee from Bayer. G. Tonini has received personal fees for advisory board/consultancy from Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Italfarmaco. Other authors declare no competing interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Patients enrolled in the study and type of treatment carried out.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Epstein JI, Allsbrook WC, Amin MB, Egevad LL. The 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) consensus conference on gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2005;29:1228–1242. doi: 10.1097/01.pas.0000173646.99337.b1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dong F, et al. Impact on the clinical outcome of prostate cancer by the 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology modified Gleason grading system. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2012;36:838–843. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e3182486faf. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lotan TL, Epstein JI. Clinical implications of changing definitions within the Gleason grading system. Nat. Rev. Urol. 2010;7:136–142. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2010.9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Magi-Galluzzi C, Montironi R, Epstein JI. Contemporary Gleason grading and novel Grade Groups in clinical practice. Curr. Opin. Urol. 2016;26(5):488–492. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000320. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lawton CAF, et al. Duration of androgen deprivation in locally advanced prostate cancer: Long-term update of NRG Oncology RTOG 9202. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2017;98:296–303. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.02.004. - DOI - PMC - PubMed