Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2022 May;17(5):368-383.
doi: 10.1002/jhm.12825. Epub 2022 May 5.

The impact of clinical decision support systems on provider behavior in the inpatient setting: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Clare E Ronan  1 , Erika L Crable  2   3 , Mari-Lynn Drainoni  4   5   6 , Allan J Walkey  4   7
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

The impact of clinical decision support systems on provider behavior in the inpatient setting: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Clare E Ronan et al. J Hosp Med. 2022 May.

Abstract

Background: Clinical decision support systems (CDSS) are used to improve processes of care. CDSS proliferation may have unintended consequences impacting effectiveness.

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of CDSS in altering clinician behavior.

Design: Electronic searches were performed in EMBASE, PubMed, and Cochrane Central Register of Control Trials for randomized controlled trials testing the impacted of CDSS on clinician behavior from 2000-2021. Extracted data included study design, CDSS attributed and outcomes, user characteristics, settings, and risk of bias. Eligible studies were analyzed qualitatively to describe CDSS types. Studies with sufficient outcome data were included in the meta-analysis.

Setting and participants: Adult inpatients in the United States.

Intervention: Clinical decision support system versus non-clinical decision support system.

Main outcome and measure: A random-effects model measured the pooled risk difference (RD) and odds ratio of clinicians' adherence to CDSS; subgroup analyses tested differences in CDSS effectiveness over time and by CDSS type.

Results: Qualitative synthesis included 22 studies. Eleven studies reported sufficient outcome data for inclusion in the meta-analysis. CDSS did not result in a statistically significant increase in clinician adoption of desired practicies (RD = 0.04 [95% confidence interval {CI} 0.00, 0.07]). CDSS from 2010-2015 (n = 5) did not increase clinician adoption of desired practice [RD -0.01, (95% CI -0.04, 0.02)].CDSS from 2016-2021 (n = 6) were associated with an increase in targeted practices [RD 0.07 (95% CI0.03, 0.12)], pInteraction = 0.004. EHR [RD 0.04 (95% CI 0.00, 0.08)] vs. non-EHR [RD 0.01 (95% CI -0.01, 0.04)] based CDSS interventions did not result in different adoption of desired practices (pInteraction = 0.27). The meta-analysis did not find an overall positive impact of CDSS on clinician behavior in the inpatient setting.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Garg AX, Adhikari NK, Mcdonald H, et al. Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance. JAMA. 2005;293(10):1223-1238. doi:10.1001/jama.293.10.1223
    1. Moja L, Kwag KH, Lytras T, et al. Effectiveness of computerized decision support systems linked to electronic health records: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Public Health. 2014;104(12):e12-e22. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2014.302164
    1. Kawamoto K, Houlihan CA, Balas EA, Lobach DF. Improving clinical practice using clinical decision support systems: a systematic review of trials to identify features critical to success. Br Med J. 2005;330(7494):765-768. doi:10.1136/bmj.38398.500764.8f
    1. Kane-Gill SL, O'Connor MF, Rothschild JM, et al. Technologic distractions (part 1): summary of approaches to manage alert quantity with intent to reduce alert fatigue and suggestions for alert fatigue metrics. Crit Care Med. 2017;45(9):1481-1488. doi:10.1097/CCM.0000000000002580
    1. Varghese J, Kleine M, Gessner SI, Sandmann S, Dugas M. Effects of computerized decision support system implementations on patient outcomes in inpatient care: a systematic review. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018;25(5):593-602. doi:10.1093/jamia/ocx100

LinkOut - more resources