Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 May-Jun;12(3):352-357.
doi: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2022.04.004. Epub 2022 Apr 19.

Evaluation of microleakage for three types of light cure orthodontic band cement

Lara Riyadh Al-Banaa  1
Affiliations

Evaluation of microleakage for three types of light cure orthodontic band cement

Lara Riyadh Al-Banaa. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2022 May-Jun.

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the microleakage of three types of light cure orthodontic band cement (Resilience, Band-it and Transbond Plus) and to compare low and high curing light intensities at the enamel-cement and band-cement interfaces in the gingival and occlusal margins.

Materials and methods: Sixty extracted human premolars were divided into six groups (n = 10 specimens) according to the type of cement used and intensity of light cure. Microetched bands of upper premolars cemented to the teeth by Transbond Plus (3 M Unitek), Resilience (Orthotechnology) and Band-it (db Orthodontics). Three groups were cured by a standard mode light cure (over 900 mw/cm2) for 20 s, and the other three groups were cured with an extra mode light cure (over 2700 mw/cm2) for 6 s. The teeth were sealed by nail varnish and immersed for 24 h in 0.5% basic fuchsin solution. After that, the teeth were sectioned in the buccoligual direction, observed under a stereomicroscope, and then recorded for microleakage at the enamel-cement and band-cement interfaces in the gingival and occlusal margins. The statistical analysis was performed using Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests, and the level of significance was set at P < 0.05.

Result: The microleakage scores showed no significant differences at the enamel-cement and band-cement interfaces among the three types of orthodontic band cement subjected to low- and high-intensity curing light.

Conclusions: The type of cement and intensity of light cure did not affect the amount of microleakage at either interface.

Keywords: Band cement; Light cure; Microleakage.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No Conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Tooth prepared before immersing in fuchsin solution.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Pictures represent the sectioning machine (Minitom): (A)body of machine,(B) Screw, (C) Cut-off disk.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Stereomicroscope with screen showing Motic software.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Diagrammatic representation of microleakage recording quoted from Sabzevari et al., (A) band-cement, (B) enamel -cement interfaces in occlusal and gingival margins.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Line drawn parallel to the microleakage at the gingival side of the cement-enamel interface.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Line drawn parallel to the microleakage at the occlusal side of the cement-band interface.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Alanzi A., Velissariou M., Al-Melh M.A., Ferguson D., Kavvadia K. Role of taste perception in white spot lesion formation during orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod. 2019;89(4):624–629. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Al Qassar S.S., Taqa A.A., Mohiaalden H.K. Can the static field improve orthodontic adhesive polymerization? J Int Dent Med Res. 2021;14(1):67–73.
    1. Fricker J.P. A 12-month clinical comparison of resin-modified light-activated adhesives for the cementation of orthodontic molar bands. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997;112:239–243. - PubMed
    1. Millett D.T., Kamahli K., McColl J. Comparative laboratory investigation of dual-cured vs conventional glass ionomer cements for band cementation. Angle Orthod. 1998;68:345–350. - PubMed
    1. Millett D.T., Cummings A., Letters S., Roger E., Love J. Resin modified glass ionomer, modified composite or conventional glass ionomer for band cementation—an in vitro evaluation. Eur J Orthod. 2003;25:609–614. - PubMed