Prognosis of patients with active cancer undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation: An insight from Japanese multicenter registry
- PMID: 35514877
- PMCID: PMC9066355
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2022.101045
Prognosis of patients with active cancer undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation: An insight from Japanese multicenter registry
Abstract
Background: Malignancy is common in older adults undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), and may affect prognosis. The present study aimed to examine whether active cancer affects all-cause mortality rates among patients undergoing TAVI.
Methods: This retrospective study examined data from 1,114 consecutive patients treated between April 2010 and June 2019. Patients with life expectancy of <1 year due to non-cardiac causes were excluded.
Results: Active cancer was defined as cancer under treatment or cured within 1 year, and was recognized in 62 patients (5.6%) with (n = 17) and without (n = 45) metastases. In multivariate analysis, being female (hazard ratio [HR] 0.55, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.39-0.77, p < 0.001), body mass index (BMI) (HR = 0.92 per 1 kg/m2 increase, 95% CI 0.87-0.97, p = 0.001), New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III/IV (HR = 1.53, 95% CI 1.06-2.20, p = 0.022), atrial fibrillation (HR = 2.40, 95% CI 1.70-3.38, p < 0.001), albumin levels (HR = 0.41 per 1-g/dl, 95% CI 0.30-0.57, p < 0.001), and cancer metastasis (HR = 5.28, 95% CI 1.86-14.9, p = 0.001) were associated with all-cause mortality after TAVI.
Conclusion: In patients undergoing TAVI, being female, high BMI, NYHA class III/IV, atrial fibrillation, albumin levels, and cancer metastasis were factors associated with mortality. Meanwhile, active cancer without metastasis was not associated with increased mortality rates. These findings would help clinical decision-making by patients and physicians.Clinical trial registration: UMIN000031133.
Keywords: AS, aortic stenosis; CI, confidence interval; CT, computed tomography; Cancer; Carcinoma; HR, hazard ratio; Malignancy; Mortality; NYHA, New York Heart Association; SAVR, surgical aortic valve replacement; TAVI, transcatheter aortic valve implantation; Transcatheter aortic valve replacement.
© 2022 The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Dr Takamisawa is a clinical proctor of Edwards Lifesciences and Medtroic. The other authors have no conflict of interest regarding this article.
Figures
References
-
- Smith C.R., Leon M.B., Mack M.J., Miller D.C., Moses J.W., Svensson L.G., et al. Transcatheter versus surgical aortic-valve replacement in high-risk patients. N. Engl. J. Med. 2011;364:2187–2198. - PubMed
-
- Leon M.B., Smith C.R., Mack M.J., Makkar R.R., Svensson L.G., Kodali S.K., et al. Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic-Valve Replacement in Intermediate-Risk Patients. N. Engl. J. Med. 2016;374:1609–1620. - PubMed
-
- Mack M.J., Leon M.B., Thourani V.H., Makkar R., Kodali S.K., Russo M., et al. Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Replacement with a Balloon-Expandable Valve in Low-Risk Patients. N. Engl. J. Med. 2019;380:1695–1705. - PubMed
-
- Watanabe Y., Kozuma K., Hioki H., Kawashima H., Nara Y., Kataoka A., et al. Comparison of Results of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Patients With Versus Without Active Cancer. Am. J. Cardiol. 2016;118:572–577. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous
