Can Peer Review Be Kinder? Supportive Peer Review: A Re-Commitment to Kindness and a Call to Action
- PMID: 35514878
- PMCID: PMC9067031
- DOI: 10.1177/20543581221080327
Can Peer Review Be Kinder? Supportive Peer Review: A Re-Commitment to Kindness and a Call to Action
Abstract
Peer review aims to select articles for publication and to improve articles before publication. We believe that this process can be infused by kindness without losing rigor. In 2014, the founding editorial team of the Canadian Journal of Kidney Health and Disease (CJKHD) made an explicit commitment to treat authors as we would wish to be treated ourselves. This broader group of authors reaffirms this principle, for which we suggest the terminology "supportive review."
L’évaluation par les pairs vise à sélectionner les articles à publier et à en améliorer le contenu avant publication. Nous sommes d’avis que ce processus peut être fait avec bienveillance sans perdre en rigueur. En 2014, l’équipe de rédaction fondatrice du Canadian Journal of Kidney Health and Disease (CJKHD) a pris l’engagement ferme de traiter les auteurs comme ses membres souhaiteraient eux-mêmes être traités. Aujourd’hui, notre groupe élargi d’auteur(e)s réaffirme ce principe pour lequel nous proposons la terminologie « évaluation constructive ».
Keywords: humility; kindness; peer review; supportive review; truth.
© The Author(s) 2022.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Many of the authors are editors for CJKHD.
Similar articles
-
Re: Journal Standards - Editor's reply.N Z Vet J. 2003 Aug;51(4):199. doi: 10.1080/00480169.2003.36367. N Z Vet J. 2003. PMID: 16032326
-
Dealing with inappropriate-, low-quality-, and other forms of challenging peer review, including hostile referees and inflammatory or confusing critiques: Prevention and treatment.Account Res. 2021 Apr;28(3):162-185. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2020.1815010. Epub 2020 Sep 16. Account Res. 2021. PMID: 32935584
-
COVID-19 pandemic and its impact on peer review speed of anesthesiology journals: An observational study.J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2021 Jan-Mar;37(1):57-62. doi: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_652_20. Epub 2021 Apr 10. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2021. PMID: 34103824 Free PMC article.
-
The peer-review process of the Journal of Neurosurgery.J Neurosurg. 1999 Feb;90(2):364-70. doi: 10.3171/jns.1999.90.2.0364. J Neurosurg. 1999. PMID: 9950511 Review.
-
[Shared responsibility in expert review of original articles].Rev Neurol. 1997 Dec;25(148):1946-50. Rev Neurol. 1997. PMID: 9528039 Review. Spanish.
Cited by
-
Our commitment to rigorous, constructive and inclusive peer review.Nat Rev Nephrol. 2022 Jul;18(7):407. doi: 10.1038/s41581-022-00569-w. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2022. PMID: 35501395 No abstract available.
-
Fostering the Next Generation of Researchers: a Sustainable Mentoring Program for Early Career Toxicologists in Scientific Abstract Review.J Med Toxicol. 2023 Apr;19(2):224-227. doi: 10.1007/s13181-023-00938-2. Epub 2023 Mar 6. J Med Toxicol. 2023. PMID: 36879004 Free PMC article.
-
Call to action: "no charge to submit or to publish".Pediatr Nephrol. 2023 Aug;38(8):2507-2508. doi: 10.1007/s00467-023-05914-0. Epub 2023 Mar 7. Pediatr Nephrol. 2023. PMID: 36881170 No abstract available.
References
-
- The Editors. Aims and scope. Canadian Journal of Kidney Health and Disease; 2020. https://journals.sagepub.com/aims-scope/CJK.
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous