Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Editorial
. 2022 May 1:9:20543581221080327.
doi: 10.1177/20543581221080327. eCollection 2022.

Can Peer Review Be Kinder? Supportive Peer Review: A Re-Commitment to Kindness and a Call to Action

Affiliations
Editorial

Can Peer Review Be Kinder? Supportive Peer Review: A Re-Commitment to Kindness and a Call to Action

Catherine M Clase et al. Can J Kidney Health Dis. .

Abstract

Peer review aims to select articles for publication and to improve articles before publication. We believe that this process can be infused by kindness without losing rigor. In 2014, the founding editorial team of the Canadian Journal of Kidney Health and Disease (CJKHD) made an explicit commitment to treat authors as we would wish to be treated ourselves. This broader group of authors reaffirms this principle, for which we suggest the terminology "supportive review."

L’évaluation par les pairs vise à sélectionner les articles à publier et à en améliorer le contenu avant publication. Nous sommes d’avis que ce processus peut être fait avec bienveillance sans perdre en rigueur. En 2014, l’équipe de rédaction fondatrice du Canadian Journal of Kidney Health and Disease (CJKHD) a pris l’engagement ferme de traiter les auteurs comme ses membres souhaiteraient eux-mêmes être traités. Aujourd’hui, notre groupe élargi d’auteur(e)s réaffirme ce principe pour lequel nous proposons la terminologie « évaluation constructive ».

Keywords: humility; kindness; peer review; supportive review; truth.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Many of the authors are editors for CJKHD.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Levin A, Clase CM, Sood MM, et al.. Canadian Journal of Kidney Health and Disease: a unique launch of a unique journal. Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2014;1:1. doi:10.1186/2054-3581-1-1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. The Editors. Aims and scope. Canadian Journal of Kidney Health and Disease; 2020. https://journals.sagepub.com/aims-scope/CJK.
    1. Smith R. Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals. J R Soc Med. 2006;99:178–182. doi:10.1258/jrsm.99.4.178. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cell Editorial Team. Science has a racism problem. Cell. 2020;181:1443–1444. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2020.06.009. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fontanarosa PB, Flanagin A, Ayanian JZ, et al.. Equity and the JAMA Network. JAMA. 2021;326:618–620. doi:10.1001/jama.2021.9377. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types