Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Jul 2;9(36):20633-20642.
doi: 10.1039/c9ra02411e. eCollection 2019 Jul 1.

One-pot construction of Cu and O co-doped porous g-C3N4 with enhanced photocatalytic performance towards the degradation of levofloxacin

Affiliations
Review

One-pot construction of Cu and O co-doped porous g-C3N4 with enhanced photocatalytic performance towards the degradation of levofloxacin

Feng Li et al. RSC Adv. .

Abstract

Low visible light response and rapid recombination of photogeneration charge carriers have always been the main factors limiting the advanced application of g-C3N4 (CN). Element doping has been confirmed to be an efficient method to improve the photocatalytic performance of CN. Here, a series of Cu and O co-doped porous g-C3N4 (Cu/O-PCN) nanomaterials were successfully fabricated by a facile one-pot thermal polymerization approach for the first time. Compared to pure CN, the resulting Cu/O-PCN exhibited remarkably enhanced visible-light-driven photocatalytic activity towards levofloxacin (LEVO) degradation. The optimized sample of 0.5% Cu doped (Cu/O-PCN-3) presented the highest degradation rate constant of 0.0676 min-1, which was about 6.2 times higher than that of CN. Furthermore, a substantial decrease in the residual toxicity against E. coli was observed after photocatalytic degradation treatment. The superior photocatalytic performance of Cu/O-PCN was mainly attributed to the synergistic advantages of stronger visible light response, larger specific surface area, and the more effective separation and transfer of photogenerated charge carriers. Moreover, according to the trapping experiments, ·O2 - and h+ were the major oxygen active species in the photocatalytic degradation process. Finally, the possible enhanced photocatalytic mechanism over Cu/O-PCN was proposed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. (a) XRD patterns of as-prepared nanomaterials. XPS spectra of Cu/O-PCN-3: (b) survey spectrum and the corresponding high-resolution of (c) C 1s, (d) N 1s, (e) O 1s, and (f) Cu 2p.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. (a and b) SEM and (c and d) TEM images of Cu/O-PCN-3, (e) STEM image of Cu/O-PCN-3 and its corresponding EDS mappings for (f) C, (g) N, (h) O, and (i) Cu.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. (a) Nitrogen adsorption–desorption isotherms and (b) BJH pore size distribution of as-prepared nanomaterials.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4. (a) UV-vis diffuse reflectance spectra, (b) Kubelka–Munk spectra and (c) the estimated band positions of as-prepared nanomaterials.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5. (a) Photocatalytic degradation of LEVO, (b) pseudo first-order kinetic plots of −ln(Ct/C0) for LEVO as a function of visible light irradiation time with as-prepared nanomaterials and (c) the change in the antibacterial activity of LEVO solution during the photocatalytic process by Cu/O-PCN-3.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6. (a) Recycling stability experiments for Cu/O-PCN-3 and (b) active species trapping experiments of Cu/O-PCN-3 during degradation of LEVO.
Fig. 7
Fig. 7. (a) Photoluminescence spectra, (b) time-resolved fluorescence spectra, (c) photo-current response and (d) EIS Nyquist plots for as-prepared nanomaterials.
Fig. 8
Fig. 8. Illustration of the possible charge transfer and separation processes of Cu/O-PCN-3 under visible light irradiation.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Li W. H. Shi Y. L. Gao L. H. Liu J. M. Cai Y. Q. Sci. Total Environ. 2013;445:306–313. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.12.050. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lillenberg M. Yurchenko S. Kipper K. Herodes K. Pihl V. Lohmus R. Ivask M. Kuu A. Kutti S. Litvin S. V. Nei L. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010;7:307–312. doi: 10.1007/BF03326140. - DOI
    1. Riaz L. Mahmood T. Kamal A. Shafqat M. Rashid A. Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2017;52:14–20. doi: 10.1016/j.etap.2017.03.002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gong Y. X. Li J. Y. Zhang Y. Y. Zhang M. Tian X. J. Wang A. M. J. Hazard. Mater. 2016;304:320–328. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.10.064. - DOI - PubMed
    1. El Najjar N. H. Touffet A. Deborde M. Journel R. Leitner N. K. V. Chemosphere. 2013;93:604–611. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.05.086. - DOI - PubMed