Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Aug 1;7(5):414-421.
doi: 10.1136/bmjstel-2020-000587. eCollection 2021.

Effectiveness of technology-enhanced simulation in teaching digital rectal examination: a systematic review narrative synthesis

Mansour A Al Asmri  1   2 , James Ennis  3 , Robert John Stone  4 , Fernando Bello  5 , M Sayeed Haque  6 , Jim Parle  7
Affiliations

Effectiveness of technology-enhanced simulation in teaching digital rectal examination: a systematic review narrative synthesis

Mansour A Al Asmri et al. BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn. .

Abstract

Background: Digital rectal examination (DRE) is a challenging examination to learn.

Objective: To synthesise evidence regarding the effectiveness of technology-enhanced simulation (TES) for acquiring DRE skills.

Study selection: EMBASE, Medline, CINAHL, Cochrane, Web of Knowledge (Science and Social Science), Scopus and IEEE Xplore were searched; the last search was performed on 3 April 2019. Included were original research studies evaluating TES to teach DRE. Data were abstracted on methodological quality, participants, instructional design and outcomes; a descriptive synthesis was performed. Quality was assessed using a modified Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument. The study design domain was modified by scoring the papers based on (1) evaluation of risk of bias for randomised controlled trials, (2) description of participants and (3) assessment of robustness and degree of simulation fidelity of the assessments used to evaluate learning.

Findings: 863 articles were screened; 12 were eligible, enrolling 1507 prequalified medical/clinical students and 20 qualified doctors. For skill acquisition, role player was statistically significantly superior to a static manikin (2 studies). For knowledge acquisition, manikin use was significantly superior to role player (1 study); 2 studies showed no difference. For confidence, manikin use was significantly superior to no manikin (4 studies). For comfort, manikin use was significantly superior to no manikin (2 studies). For anxiety, role player was significantly superior to manikin (1 study).

Median overall quality score (QS) was 48% (27-62). Highest median QS was 73% (33-80) for data analysis; lowest median QS was 20% (7-40) for the validity of instrument. Six papers scored over 50% of the maximum score for overall quality.

Conclusions: TES training is associated with improved DRE skills and should be used more widely.

Keywords: Clinical competence; medical simulation; simulation based learning; systematic review; technology enhanced learning.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Trial flow. RCT, randomised controlled trial.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence . Suspected cancer: recognition and referral. 2015. Available https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng12/chapter/1-Recommendations-organise... (accessed 12 Feb 2019) - PubMed
    1. Carvalhal GF, Smith DS, Mager DE, et al. Digital rectal examination for detecting prostate cancer at prostate specific antigen levels of 4 ng./ml. Or less. J Urol 1999;161:835–9. 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)61785-3 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Verghese A, Charlton B, Kassirer JP, et al. Inadequacies of physical examination as a cause of medical errors and adverse events: a collection of vignettes. Am J Med 2015;128:1322–1324. e1323. 10.1016/j.amjmed.2015.06.004 - DOI - PubMed
    1. General Medical Council . Intimate examinations and chaperones: guidance. 2013. Available https://www.gmc-uk.org/-/media/documents/maintaining-boundaries-intimate... (accessed 15 Mar 2019)
    1. General Medical Council . Duties of a doctor. 1995. Available https://www.gmc-uk.org/ethical-guidance/ethical-guidance-for-doctors/goo... (accessed 12 Sept 2018)

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources