Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jan 27;7(5):360-365.
doi: 10.1136/bmjstel-2020-000685. eCollection 2021.

Brick in the wall? Linking quality of debriefing to participant learning in team training of interprofessional students

John T Paige  1 , Deborah D Garbee  2 , Qingzhao Yu  3 , John Zahmjahn  4 , Raquel Baroni de Carvalho  5 , Lin Zhu  6 , Vadym Rusnak  7 , Vladimir J Kiselov  8
Affiliations

Brick in the wall? Linking quality of debriefing to participant learning in team training of interprofessional students

John T Paige et al. BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn. .

Abstract

Background: The evidence for the conventional wisdom that debriefing quality determines the effectiveness of learning in simulation-based training is lacking. We investigated whether the quality of debriefing in using simulation-based training in team training correlated with the degree of learning of participants.

Methods: Forty-two teams of medical and undergraduate nursing students participated in simulation-based training sessions using a two-scenario format with after-action debriefing. Observers rated team performance with an 11-item Teamwork Assessment Scales (TAS) instrument (three subscales, team-based behaviours (5-items), shared mental model (3-items), adaptive communication and response (3-items)). Two independent, blinded raters evaluated video-recorded facilitator team prebriefs and debriefs using the Objective Structured Assessment of Debriefing (OSAD) 8-item tool. Descriptive statistics were calculated, t-test comparisons made and multiple linear regression and univariate analysis used to compare OSAD item scores and changes in TAS scores.

Results: Statistically significant improvements in all three TAS subscales occurred from scenario 1 to 2. Seven faculty teams taught learners with all scores ≥3.0 (except two) for prebriefs and all scores ≥ 3.5 (except one) for debriefs (OSAD rating 1=done poorly to 5=done well). Linear regression analysis revealed a single statistically significant correlation between debrief engagement and adaptive communication and response score without significance on univariate analysis.

Conclusions: Quality of debriefing does not seem to increase the degree of learning in interprofessional education using simulation-based training of prelicensure student teams. Such a finding may be due to the relatively high quality of the prebrief and debrief of the faculty teams involved in the training.

Keywords: debriefing; health professions education; high fidelity simulation; interprofessional Education; simulation-based medical education.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: JP receives royalties from Oxford University Press and Springer Nature for three books relating to simulation or surgical education. He also is a consultant to Boston Scientific as a faculty instructor. Finally, he receives grant support from the Southern Group on Educational Affairs (SGEA) and the International Association of Medical Science Educators (IAMSE) as PI for teamwork research as well as from Acell as a site investigator for wound healing research. DDG and QY are coinvestigators on the SGEA and IAMSE grants. The remaining authors do not have any disclosures.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Mannix R, Nagler J. Tribalism in Medicine-Us vs them. JAMA Pediatr 2017;171:831. 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.1280 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Braithwaite J, Clay-Williams R, Vecellio E, et al. . The basis of clinical tribalism, hierarchy and stereotyping: a laboratory-controlled teamwork experiment. BMJ Open 2016;6:e012467. 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012467 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Weller J, Boyd M, Cumin D. Teams, tribes and patient safety: overcoming barriers to effective teamwork in healthcare. Postgrad Med J 2014;90:149–54. 10.1136/postgradmedj-2012-131168 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Davis WA, Jones S, Crowell-Kuhnberg AM, et al. . Operative team communication during simulated emergencies: too busy to respond? Surgery 2017;161:1348–56. 10.1016/j.surg.2016.09.027 - DOI - PubMed
    1. El-Shafy IA, Delgado J, Akerman M, et al. . Closed-Loop communication improves task completion in pediatric trauma resuscitation. J Surg Educ 2018;75:58–64. 10.1016/j.jsurg.2017.06.025 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources