Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Feb 18;9(10):5844-5857.
doi: 10.1039/c8ra10058f. eCollection 2019 Feb 11.

Catalytic pyrolysis of plastic waste for the production of liquid fuels for engines

Affiliations

Catalytic pyrolysis of plastic waste for the production of liquid fuels for engines

Supattra Budsaereechai et al. RSC Adv. .

Abstract

Catalytic pyrolysis of waste plastics using low cost binder-free pelletized bentonite clay has been investigated to yield pyrolysis oils as drop-in replacements for commercial liquid fuels such as diesel and gasohol 91. Pyrolysis of four waste plastics, polystyrene, polypropylene, low density polyethylene and high density polyethylene, was achieved at a bench scale (1 kg per batch) to produce useful fuel products. Importantly, the addition of binder-free bentonite clay pellets successfully yielded liquid based fuels with increased calorific values and lower viscosity for all plastic wastes. This larger scale pyrolysis study demonstrated that use of a catalyst in powder form can lead to significant pressure drops in the catalyst column, thus slowing the process (more than 1 hour). Importantly, the use of catalyst pellets eliminated the pressure drop and reduced pyrolysis processing time to only 10 minutes for 1 kg of plastic waste. The pyrolysis oil composition from polystyrene consists of 95% aromatic hydrocarbons, while in contrast, those from polypropylene, low density polyethylene and high density polyethylene, were dominated by aliphatic hydrocarbons, as confirmed by GC-MS. FTIR analysis demonstrated that low density polyethylene and high density polyethylene oils had functional groups that were consistent with those of commercial diesel (96% similarity match). In contrast, pyrolysis-oils from polystyrene demonstrated chemical and physical properties similar to those of gasohol 91. In both cases no wax formation was observed when using the bentonite clay pellets as a catalyst in the pyrolysis process, which was attributed to the high acidity of the bentonite catalyst (low SiO2 : Al2O3 ratio), thus making it more active in cracking waxes compared to the less acidic heterogeneous catalysts reported in the literature. Pyrolysis-oil from the catalytic treatment of polystyrene resulted in greater engine power, comparable engine temperature, and lower carbon monoxide (CO) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, as compared to those of uncatalysed oils and commercial fuel in a gasoline engine. Pyrolysis-oils from all other polymers demonstrated comparable performance to diesel in engine power tests. The application of inexpensive and widely available bentonite clay in pyrolysis could significantly aid in repurposing plastic wastes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Schematic diagram of bench scale pyrolysis unit.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. TGA curves of waste plastics heated under nitrogen at 10 °C min−1.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. N2 adsorption–desorption isotherms at 77 K of bentonite clay.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4. Influence of heating rate on production of oil from plastic wastes.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5. CO and CO2 emission from (a) gasoline brush cutter and (b) diesel pump at speed of 2000 rpm (NC = no catalyst and C = catalyst).
Fig. 6
Fig. 6. Variation of engine (a) temperature and (b) power with speed for gasoline brush cutter.
Fig. 7
Fig. 7. (a) Engine temperature and (b) power of diesel pump at speed of 2000 rpm (NC = no catalyst and C = catalyst).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Awasthi A. K. Shivashankar M. Majumder S. IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng. 2017;263:022024. doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/263/2/022024. - DOI
    1. Fivga A. Dimitriou I. Energy. 2018;149:865. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2018.02.094. - DOI
    1. Sharuddin S. D. A. Daud W. M. A. W. Aroua M. K. Energy Convers. Manage. 2016;115:308. doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2016.02.037. - DOI
    1. Shah J. Jan M. R. Mabood F. Jabeen F. Energy Convers. Manage. 2010;51:2791. doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2010.06.016. - DOI
    1. Jan M. R. Shah J. Gulab H. Fuel. 2013;105:595. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2012.09.016. - DOI