Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 May 17;9(26):15033-15041.
doi: 10.1039/c9ra02634g. eCollection 2019 May 9.

Highly effective photocatalytic performance of {001}-TiO2/MoS2/RGO hybrid heterostructures for the reduction of Rh B

Affiliations

Highly effective photocatalytic performance of {001}-TiO2/MoS2/RGO hybrid heterostructures for the reduction of Rh B

Ya Gao et al. RSC Adv. .

Abstract

Effective separation and rapid transfer of photogenerated electron-hole pairs are key features of photocatalytic materials with high catalytic activity, which could be achieved in co-catalysts. It is reported that the two-dimensional (2D) MoS2 is a promising co-catalyst due to its unique semi-conductive properties and graphene-like layered structure. However, the application of MoS2 as a co-catalyst is limited by its poor electrical conductivity. On the other hand, it is worth noting that TiO2 possesses reactive crystal facets, which is one of the dominant mechanisms for the separation of photogenerated electron-hole pairs. In this work, we prepared MoS2/RGO hybrids as co-catalysts which were doped to TiO2 with highly reactive {001} planes via the hydrothermal method. It was found that the {001}-TiO2/MoS2/RGO photocatalysts with 7 wt% MoS2/RGO co-catalyst show the highest photodegradation activity for the degradation of Rh B under visible light irradiation (λ > 400 nm), which could result from the synergy of the effective separation of electron-hole pairs by the {001} facets in TiO2 and the rapid transfer of electron-hole pairs in MoS2/RGO. The results show that the {001}-TiO2/MoS2/RGO hybrid is a low-cost and stable photocatalyst for the effective degradation of Rh B under visible light.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There is no conflict in the statement.

Figures

Scheme 1
Scheme 1. Synthetic routes for the {001}-TiO2 nanosheets and the {001}-TiO2/MoS2/RGO composites.
Fig. 1
Fig. 1. (a) XRD patterns for MoS2/RGO, {001}-TiO2 and {001}-TiO2/MoS2/RGO, the inset is at 2θ = 5–45°; (b) Raman spectrum for {001}-TiO2/MoS2/RGO; (c) XPS survey spectrum for {001}-TiO2/MoS2/RGO; high-resolution spectra of {001}-TiO2/MoS2/RGO (d) Ti 2p; (e) Mo 3d; (f) S 2p.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. SEM images of MoS2 (a), MoS2/RGO (b), TiO2 (c) and {001}-TiO2/MoS2/RGO (d).
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. TEM images of RGO (a), MoS2 (b), MoS2/RGO (c), {001}-TiO2 (d), {001}-TiO2/MoS2/RGO (e); HRTEM image of {001}-TiO2/MoS2/RGO (f).
Fig. 4
Fig. 4. Photocatalytic degradation of Rh B under visible light irradiation over (λ > 400 nm) (a) {001}-TiO2/MoS2/RGO with different RGO percentages; (b) {001}-TiO2/MoS2/RGO with different contents of MoS2/0.03RGO; (c) blank, {001}-TiO2, {001}-TiO2/0.07GO, {001}-TiO2/0.07MoS2 and {001}-TiO2/0.07(MoS2/0.03RGO). (d) UV-visible spectra of {001}-TiO2/MoS2/RGO.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5. (a) UV-vis diffusive reflectance spectra of pure {001}-TiO2 and {001}-TiO2/MoS2/RGO; the inset is corresponding plot of the transformed Kubelka–Munk function versus the energy of light; (b) N2 adsorption/desorption isotherms of pure {001}-TiO2 and {001}-TiO2/MoS2/RGO; (c) PL spectra of pure {001}-TiO2 and {001}-TiO2/MoS2/RGO under 400 nm excitation wavelength; (d) electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) Nyquist plots of the sample electrodes which are made from the pure {001}-TiO2 and {001}-TiO2/MoS2/RGO treated with visible light (λ > 400 nm) irradiation; (e) schematic diagram for photocatalytic mechanism of {001}-TiO2/MoS2/RGO.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hoffmann M. R. Choi W. Bahnemann D. W. Chem. Rev. 1995;95:69–96. doi: 10.1021/cr00033a004. - DOI
    1. Serpone N. Emeline A. V. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2012;3:673–677. doi: 10.1021/jz300071j. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Robertson P. K. J. Robertson J. M. C. Bahnemann D. W. J. Hazard. Mater. 2012;211:161–171. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.11.058. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kisch H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2013;52:812–847. doi: 10.1002/anie.201201200. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Albu S. P. Ghicov A. Macak J. M. Schmuki P. Nano Lett. 2007;7:1286–1289. doi: 10.1021/nl070264k. - DOI - PubMed