Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 May 29;9(29):16869-16883.
doi: 10.1039/c9ra00872a. eCollection 2019 May 24.

A comprehensive review of recent developments in 3D printing technique for ceramic membrane fabrication for water purification

Affiliations
Review

A comprehensive review of recent developments in 3D printing technique for ceramic membrane fabrication for water purification

Hitesh Dommati et al. RSC Adv. .

Abstract

Additive manufacturing (AM), which is also commonly known as 3D printing, provides flexibility in the manufacturing of complex geometric parts at competitive prices and within a low production time. However, AM has not been used to a large extent in filtration and water treatment processes. AM results in the creation of millions of nanofibers that are sublayered on top of each other and compressed into a thin membrane. AM is a novel technique for fabricating filtration membranes with different shapes, sizes and controlled porosity, which cannot be achieved using conventional process such as electrospinning and knife casting. In this paper, we review the advantages and limitations of AM processes for fabricating ceramic membranes. Moreover, a brief background of AM processes is provided, and their future prospects are examined. Due to their potential benefits for fabrication and flexibility with different materials, AM methods are promising in the field of membrane engineering.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflicts to declare.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Comparative study of the number of peer reviewed research articles since 2014 (data analysis of publications was executed using the advanced Scopus scholar search system with the term “3D printing” and “membrane” and “water filtration”, as on November 2018).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Contribution of various countries to the 3D printed membrane for water filtration (database collected from advanced Scopus scholar search with the term “3D printing” and “membrane” and “water filtration”, as on November 2018).
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. The past and present scenario of AM technique compared to the traditional manufacturing process.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4. AM processes classified as per ASTM standards.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5. Morphological study of ceramic materials obtained from (a) Material Extrusion (ME); (b) Vat Photo-polymerization (VP); (c) Binder Jetting (BJ); and (d) Powder Bed Fusion (PBF).
Fig. 6
Fig. 6. Schematic flowchart of 3D printing process of ceramic membrane fabrication [note: specifically, ceramic material has been considered for production of membrane].
Fig. 7
Fig. 7. Layouts of 7 different types of AM processes.
Fig. 8
Fig. 8. Three level hierarchy model for selection of best method for ceramic membrane fabrication.
Fig. 9
Fig. 9. Future possibilities with AM technique for fabricating novel ceramic membranes.
None
Hitesh Dommati
None
Saikat Sinha Ray
None
Jia-Chang Wang
None
Shiao-Shing Chen

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bogue R. Assemb. Autom. 2013;33:307. doi: 10.1108/AA-06-2013-055. - DOI
    1. Dudek P. Arch. Metall. Mater. 2013;58:1415.
    1. Ligon S. C. Liska R. Stampfl J. r. Gurr M. Mülhaupt R. Chem. Rev. 2017;117:10212. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00074. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Deckers J. Vleugels J. Kruth J.-P. J. Ceram. Sci. Technol. 2014;5:245.
    1. Frazier W. E. J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 2014;23:1917. doi: 10.1007/s11665-014-0958-z. - DOI