Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jan 28;9(7):3661-3668.
doi: 10.1039/c8ra09517e. eCollection 2019 Jan 25.

Efficient synthesis of C15 fuel precursor by heterogeneously catalyzed aldol-condensation of furfural with cyclopentanone

Affiliations

Efficient synthesis of C15 fuel precursor by heterogeneously catalyzed aldol-condensation of furfural with cyclopentanone

Lei Ao et al. RSC Adv. .

Abstract

The aldol-condensation reaction of biomass-derived furfural and cyclopentanone coupled with hydrogenation/hydrodeoxygenation is a promising route for the production of renewable high-quality diesel or jet fuel. In this paper, we focus on the heterogeneously catalyzed aldol condensation of furfural with cyclopentanone, in order to maximize the yield of 2,5-bis(2-furylmethylidene)cyclopentan-1-one (F2C, a C15 fuel precursor). Experiments were conducted over a series of solid-base catalysts and it was found that potassium fluoride impregnated alumina shown the highest catalytic efficiency. We further investigated the effect of different parameters on the performance of KF/γ-Al2O3, including KF loading amount, solvent, reaction time and temperature. Over KF/γ-Al2O3 with a 33% KF loading amount, the aldol reaction achieved an F2C molar yield up to 95.4% at 333 K within 2 h. Under the nearly optimal condition, the separated solid product is almost F2C with a purity of 100%, providing a high-quality biofuel precursor for the next processing step.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflicts to declare.

Figures

Scheme 1
Scheme 1. Comparison of the obtained fuel products using different ketones as second reactants.
Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Conversions of furfural (white bar), yields (grey bar) and selectivities (black bar) of F2C over different solid-base catalysts. Reaction conditions: 333 K, 2 h; 1.92 g furfural, 0.84 g cyclopentanone (furfural/cyclopentanone mole ratio 2 : 1), 40 mL methanol and 0.2 g catalyst were used in each reaction; the KF loading of KF/γ-Al2O3 was 20 wt%.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. CO2-TPD curves of different solid-base catalysts.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. XRD patterns of γ-Al2O3 and KF/γ-Al2O3.
Scheme 2
Scheme 2. Proposed pathway for the furfural–cyclopentanone aldol condensation over KF/γ-Al2O3.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4. Conversions of furfural () and yields of F2C () over different loading amount KF/γ-Al2O3. Reaction conditions: 333 K, 2 h; 1.92 g furfural, 0.84 g cyclopentanone (furfural/cyclopentanone molar ratio 2 : 1), 0.2 g catalyst and 40 mL ethanol were used in each reaction.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5. Furfural conversions () and F2C yields () over 33 wt% KF/γ-Al2O3 at different reaction temperatures. Reaction conditions: 2 h; 1.92 g furfural, 0.84 g cyclopentanone (furfural/cyclopentanone molar ratio 2 : 1), 0.2 g catalyst and 40 mL methanol were used in each reaction.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6. Furfural conversion () and F2C yield () over 33 wt% KF/γ-Al2O3 as a function of reaction time. Reaction conditions: 333 K; 1.92 g furfural, 0.84 g cyclopentanone (furfural/cyclopentanone molar ratio 2 : 1), 0.2 g catalyst and 40 mL methanol were used in each reaction.
Fig. 7
Fig. 7. Conversions of furfural (white bar), yields (grey bar) and selectivities (black bar) of F2C over recycled 33 wt% KF/γ-Al2O3. Reaction conditions: 333 K, 2 h; 1.92 g furfural, 0.84 g cyclopentanone (furfural/cyclopentanone molar ratio 2 : 1), 0.2 g catalyst and 40 mL methanol were used in each reaction.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Huber G. W. Iborra S. Corma A. Chem. Rev. 2006;106:4044–4098. doi: 10.1021/cr068360d. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Alonso D. M. Bond J. Q. Dumesic J. A. Green Chem. 2010;12:1493–1513. doi: 10.1039/C004654J. - DOI
    1. Zhang Y. P. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2008;35:367–375. doi: 10.1007/s10295-007-0293-6. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Elliott D. C. Beckman D. Bridgwater A. V. Diebold J. P. Gevert S. B. Solantausta Y. Energy Fuels. 1991;5:399–410. doi: 10.1021/ef00027a008. - DOI
    1. Soares R. R. Simonetti D. A. Dumesic J. A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006;45:3982–3985. doi: 10.1002/anie.200600212. - DOI - PubMed