Randomized prospective study of ceftazidime versus ceftazidime plus cephalothin in empiric treatment of febrile episodes in severely neutropenic patients
- PMID: 3551829
- PMCID: PMC174690
- DOI: 10.1128/AAC.31.2.191
Randomized prospective study of ceftazidime versus ceftazidime plus cephalothin in empiric treatment of febrile episodes in severely neutropenic patients
Abstract
In a prospective randomized study, ceftazidime monotherapy was compared with a combination of ceftazidime plus cephalothin in 102 febrile neutropenic patients. Thirty bacteriologically documented infections, of which 23 were bacteremias, in 48 clinically assessable patients were treated with ceftazidime alone. Twenty-four bacteriologically proven infections, of which 18 were bacteremias, in 42 clinically assessable patients were treated with a combination of ceftazidime and cephalothin. The clinical response rates in assessable patients were 77% for ceftazidime monotherapy and 88% for the combination. The bacteriological clearance rate was 70% for ceftazidime monotherapy and 79% for the combination. Efficacy against gram-negative pathogens appeared to be excellent, with 93% clearance for ceftazidime monotherapy and 100% clearance for the combination. The bacteriological clearance of gram-positive infections was only 60% for both regimens, with failures mainly due to Streptococcus faecalis and Streptococcus sanguis, which are primarily resistant to both ceftazidime and cephalothin. After addition of vancomycin to those infections which did not respond to empiric therapy, bacteriological clearance rates of 94% (ceftazidime plus vancomycin) and 90% (ceftazidime and cephalothin plus vancomycin) were achieved. Three superinfections were registered in the ceftazidime group and two were seen in the combination group. Other adverse effects of ceftazidime were minimal and were not enhanced by combination with cephalothin. It is concluded that ceftazidime is an effective drug for the empiric treatment of febrile neutropenic patients, especially if one is prepared to modify therapy if resistant gram-positive strains or mycotic infections are encountered. Neither the clinical nor bacteriological cure rates could be substantially improved by adding cephalothin to ceftazidime in initial empiric treatment of febrile neutropenic patients.
Similar articles
-
A randomized prospective study of ceftazidime versus ceftazidime plus flucloxacillin in the empiric treatment of febrile episodes in severely neutropenic patients.Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1985 Dec;28(6):824-8. doi: 10.1128/AAC.28.6.824. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1985. PMID: 3909956 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Ceftazidime with or without vancomycin vs. cephalothin, carbenicillin and gentamicin as the initial therapy of the febrile neutropenic pediatric cancer patient.Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1988 Mar;7(3):165-70. doi: 10.1097/00006454-198803000-00006. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1988. PMID: 3282214 Clinical Trial.
-
Randomized trial of beta-lactam regimens in febrile neutropenic cancer patients.Am J Med. 1988 Mar;84(3 Pt 2):581-9. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(88)90140-4. Am J Med. 1988. PMID: 3279774 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparative study of cefepime versus ceftazidime in the empiric treatment of pediatric cancer patients with fever and neutropenia.Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2001 Mar;20(3):362-9. doi: 10.1097/00006454-200103000-00036. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2001. PMID: 11303851 Review.
-
Empiric monotherapy in neutropenia: a realistic goal?Scand J Infect Dis Suppl. 1995;96:34-7. Scand J Infect Dis Suppl. 1995. PMID: 7652501 Review.
Cited by
-
Interventional antimicrobial therapy in febrile neutropenic patients. Study Group of the Paul Ehrlich Society for Chemotherapy.Ann Hematol. 1994 Nov;69(5):231-43. doi: 10.1007/BF01700277. Ann Hematol. 1994. PMID: 7948312 Clinical Trial.
-
A randomized clinical trial of ceftriaxone and teicoplanin versus ceftazidime and teicoplanin as antibiotic therapy in febrile neutropenic cancer patients and bone marrow transplant recipients.Infection. 1994 Jul-Aug;22(4):271-5. doi: 10.1007/BF01739915. Infection. 1994. PMID: 8002087 Clinical Trial.
-
Ceftazidime. An update of its antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic efficacy.Drugs. 1995 Apr;49(4):577-617. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199549040-00008. Drugs. 1995. PMID: 7789291 Review.
-
Pharmacoeconomic analysis of empirical therapy with ceftazidime alone or combination antibiotics for febrile neutropenia in cancer patients.Pharmacoeconomics. 1995 Jan;7(1):49-62. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199507010-00006. Pharmacoeconomics. 1995. PMID: 10155293
-
Cost-effectiveness of ceftazidime or imipenem/cilastatin versus ceftriaxone + aminoglycoside in the treatment of febrile episodes in neutropenic cancer patients in Germany.Infection. 1999 Jan-Feb;27(1):23-7. doi: 10.1007/BF02565166. Infection. 1999. PMID: 10027102
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical