Residents' use of mobile technologies: three challenges for graduate medical education
- PMID: 35518906
- PMCID: PMC8936566
- DOI: 10.1136/bmjstel-2016-000185
Residents' use of mobile technologies: three challenges for graduate medical education
Abstract
Introduction: The practice of medicine involves, among other things, managing ambiguity, interpreting context and making decisions in the face of uncertainty. These uncertainties, amplified for learners, can be negotiated in a variety of ways; however, the promise, efficiency and availability of mobile technologies and clinical decision supports make these tools an appealing way to manage ambiguity.Mobile technologies are becoming increasingly prevalent in medical education and in the practice of medicine. Because of this, we explored how the use of mobile technologies is influencing residents' experiences of graduate medical education.
Methods: We conducted an 18-month qualitative investigation to explore this issue. Our research was conceptually and theoretically framed in sociomaterial studies of professional learning. Specifically, our methods included logging of technology use and related reflexive writing by residents (n=10), interviews with residents (n=12) and interviews with faculty (n=6).
Results: We identified three challenges for graduate medical education related to mobile technology use: (1) efficiency versus critical thinking; (2) patient context versus evidence-based medicine and (3) home/work-life balance.
Discussion: In this digital age, decontextualised knowledge is readily available. Our data indicate that rather than access to accurate knowledge, the more pressing challenge for medical educators is managing how, when and why learners choose to access that information.
Keywords: ethnography; graduate medical education; mobile technologies.
© Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: None declared.
Similar articles
-
Seeking coherence between 'mobile learning' applications and the everyday lives of medical residents.Perspect Med Educ. 2019 Jun;8(3):152-159. doi: 10.1007/s40037-019-0519-0. Perspect Med Educ. 2019. PMID: 31175609 Free PMC article.
-
Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):14-26. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1694. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015. PMID: 26447004
-
Keystone: Exploring Pediatric Residents' Experiences in a Longitudinal Integrated Block.Teach Learn Med. 2019 Jan-Mar;31(1):99-108. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2018.1478732. Epub 2018 Oct 10. Teach Learn Med. 2019. PMID: 30303403
-
Influences on the Implementation of Mobile Learning for Medical and Nursing Education: Qualitative Systematic Review by the Digital Health Education Collaboration.J Med Internet Res. 2019 Feb 28;21(2):e12895. doi: 10.2196/12895. J Med Internet Res. 2019. PMID: 30816847 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluating Coding Accuracy in General Surgery Residents' Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Procedural Case Logs.J Surg Educ. 2016 Nov-Dec;73(6):e59-e63. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2016.07.017. J Surg Educ. 2016. PMID: 27886974 Review.
Cited by
-
Can Medical Students Evaluate Medical Websites?: A mixed-methods study from Oman.Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2022 Aug;22(3):362-369. doi: 10.18295/squmj.8.2021.114. Epub 2022 Aug 25. Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2022. PMID: 36072073 Free PMC article.
-
Disruption in the space-time continuum: why digital ethnography matters.Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2022 Aug;27(3):877-892. doi: 10.1007/s10459-022-10101-1. Epub 2022 Apr 7. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2022. PMID: 35389151 Free PMC article. Review.
References
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources