What are the measures that can be used to assess performance during in situ Paediatric Emergency Medicine Simulation?
- PMID: 35518909
- PMCID: PMC8990193
- DOI: 10.1136/bmjstel-2016-000140
What are the measures that can be used to assess performance during in situ Paediatric Emergency Medicine Simulation?
Abstract
Background: Paediatric in situ simulation within emergency departments is growing in popularity as an approach for improving multidisciplinary team working, enabling clinical skills development and exploring the importance of human factors in the clinical setting. However, measuring the success of such programmes is often through participant feedback of satisfaction and not measures of performance, which makes it difficult to assess whether such programmes lead to improvements in clinical behaviour.
Objective: To identify the measures that can be used to assess performance during in situ paediatric emergency medicine simulations.
Study selection: A literature search of EMBASE, ERIC and MEDLINE was performed using the key terms (Paediatrics and Emergency and Simulation.) MeSH and subheadings were used to ensure all possible variations of the key terms were included within the search.
Findings: The search revealed 607 articles, with 16 articles meeting inclusion criteria. Three themes of evaluation strategy were identified-the use of feedback forms (56% n=9/16), performance evaluation methods (63% n=10/16) or other strategies (25% n=4/16), which included provider comfort scores, latent safety threat identification and episodes of suboptimal care and their causation.
Conclusions: The most frequently used method of assessment in paediatric emergency department simulation are performance evaluation methods. None of the studies in this area have looked at patient level outcomes and this is therefore an area which should be explored in the future.
Keywords: emergency medicine; in situ simulation; paediatrics.
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: None declared.
Figures
Similar articles
-
A comprehensive systematic review of the use of simulation in the continuing education and training of qualified medical, nursing and midwifery staff.JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2011;9(17):538-587. doi: 10.11124/01938924-201109170-00001. JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2011. PMID: 27819938
-
Multidisciplinary In Situ Simulation-Based Training as a Postpartum Hemorrhage Quality Improvement Project.Mil Med. 2017 Mar;182(3):e1762-e1766. doi: 10.7205/MILMED-D-16-00030. Mil Med. 2017. PMID: 28290956
-
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881. Med J Aust. 2020. PMID: 33314144
-
Youth violence intervention programme for vulnerable young people attending emergency departments in London: a rapid evaluation.Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2023 Jul;11(10):1-122. doi: 10.3310/JWKT0492. Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2023. PMID: 37470144
-
Identifying models of care to improve outcomes for older people with urgent care needs: a mixed methods approach to develop a system dynamics model.Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2023 Sep;11(14):1-183. doi: 10.3310/NLCT5104. Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2023. PMID: 37830206 Review.
Cited by
-
Evaluation of a multiple-encounter in situ simulation for orientation of staff to a new paediatric emergency service: a single-group pretest/post-test study.BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn. 2017 Oct;3(4):149-153. doi: 10.1136/bmjstel-2016-000138. Epub 2017 Jun 28. BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn. 2017. PMID: 29354279 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Kirkpatrick D, Kirkpatrick J. Evaluating training programs: the four levels. 3rd edn. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc., 2006.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources