Differences in talking-to-the-room behaviour between novice and expert teams during simulated paediatric resuscitation: a quasi-experimental study
- PMID: 35519005
- PMCID: PMC8936681
- DOI: 10.1136/bmjstel-2017-000268
Differences in talking-to-the-room behaviour between novice and expert teams during simulated paediatric resuscitation: a quasi-experimental study
Abstract
Background: Team coordination represents an important factor for clinical performance. Research in this area suggests that not only behaviour frequencies but also patterns of team coordination constitute a central aspect of teamwork. However, little is known about potential differences in coordination patterns between novice teams (ie, teams of inexperienced members) and expert teams (ie, teams of experienced members). The current study addresses this gap by investigating the use of talking-to-the-room-an important implicit coordination behaviour-in novice teams versus expert teams.
Aim: To illustrate differences in coordination behaviour between novice and expert teams. This will provide important knowledge for simulation-based training.
Methods: The study was conducted in the context of two resuscitation training courses (introductory course and refresher course) for staff members at a children's hospital. Volunteers from both courses participated in the study. They were randomly assigned to 16 teams each consisting of one physician and two nurses. The study used a quasi-experimental design with two conditions (novice vs expert). Participants of the introductory course were assigned to the novice condition (eight teams), and participants of the refresher course were assigned to the expert condition (eight teams). All teams completed the same standardised paediatric resuscitation scenario. They were videotaped during the simulation, and team coordination behaviour was coded using Co-ACT.
Results: Lag-sequential analysis of 1902 distinct coordination acts revealed that novice teams and expert teams differed significantly in their coordination behaviour. Expert teams were characterised by patterns in which implicit coordination behaviour (ie, talking to the room) was followed by further implicit coordination behaviour and not followed by explicit coordination behaviour (ie, instructions), whereas the reverse was found for novice teams.
Conclusion: The current study highlights role of coordination patterns for understanding teamwork in healthcare and provides important insights for team training.
Keywords: behavioural observation; coordination; talking-to-the-room; team training; teamwork.
© Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: None declared.
Figures

Similar articles
-
Monitoring and talking to the room: autochthonous coordination patterns in team interaction and performance.J Appl Psychol. 2014 Nov;99(6):1254-67. doi: 10.1037/a0037877. Epub 2014 Sep 15. J Appl Psychol. 2014. PMID: 25222522
-
Co-ACT--a framework for observing coordination behaviour in acute care teams.BMJ Qual Saf. 2013 Jul;22(7):596-605. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001319. Epub 2013 Mar 19. BMJ Qual Saf. 2013. PMID: 23513239
-
Rating the quality of teamwork-a comparison of novice and expert ratings using the Team Emergency Assessment Measure (TEAM) in simulated emergencies.Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2019 Feb 8;27(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s13049-019-0591-9. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2019. PMID: 30736821 Free PMC article.
-
Observational teamwork assessment for surgery: construct validation with expert versus novice raters.Ann Surg. 2009 Jun;249(6):1047-51. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181a50220. Ann Surg. 2009. PMID: 19474694
-
What is the impact of multidisciplinary team simulation training on team performance and efficiency of patient care? An integrative review.Australas Emerg Nurs J. 2016 Feb;19(1):44-53. doi: 10.1016/j.aenj.2015.10.001. Epub 2015 Nov 21. Australas Emerg Nurs J. 2016. PMID: 26614537 Review.
Cited by
-
Investigating voice in action teams: a critical review.Cogn Technol Work. 2021;23(3):605-624. doi: 10.1007/s10111-020-00646-9. Epub 2020 Aug 5. Cogn Technol Work. 2021. PMID: 34720736 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of temporary nursing staff on communication patterns: an observation study during daily nurse huddles.BMJ Open Qual. 2025 Jun 1;14(2):e003242. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003242. BMJ Open Qual. 2025. PMID: 40451297 Free PMC article.
-
The use of specific coordination behaviours to manage information processing and task distribution in real and simulated trauma teamwork: an observational study.Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2024 Dec 10;32(1):128. doi: 10.1186/s13049-024-01287-x. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2024. PMID: 39658788 Free PMC article.
-
Opinion Paper: Rationale for Supra-National Training in Neonatology.Front Pediatr. 2022 Jul 1;10:899160. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.899160. eCollection 2022. Front Pediatr. 2022. PMID: 35844736 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Marks MA, Mathieu JE, Zaccaro SJ. A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes. Academy of Management Review 2001;26:356–76.
-
- Mathieu J, Maynard MT, Rapp T, et al. . Team effectiveness 1997-2007: a review of recent advancements and a glimpse into the future. J Manage 2008;34:410–76. 10.1177/0149206308316061 - DOI
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous