Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jul 14;10(44):26433-26442.
doi: 10.1039/d0ra04707d. eCollection 2020 Jul 9.

Theoretical investigation of the reaction mechanisms and kinetics of CFCl2CH2O2 and ClO in the atmosphere

Affiliations

Theoretical investigation of the reaction mechanisms and kinetics of CFCl2CH2O2 and ClO in the atmosphere

Yunju Zhang et al. RSC Adv. .

Abstract

The reaction between CFCl2CH2O2 radicals and ClO was studied using the B3LYP and CCSD(T) methods associated with the 6-311++G(d,p) and cc-pVTZ basis sets, and subsequently RRKM-TST theory was used to predict the thermal rate constants and product distributions. On the singlet PES, the dominant reaction is the addition of the ClO oxygen atom to the terminal-O of CFCl2CH2O2 to generate adduct IM1 (CFCl2CH2OOOCl), and then dissociation to final products P1 (CFCl2CHO + HO2 + Cl) occurs. RRKM theory is employed to calculate the overall and individual rate constants over a wide range of temperatures and pressures. It is predicted that the collision-stabilized IM1 (CFCl2CH2OOOCl) dominates the reaction at 200-500 K (accounting for about 60-100%) and the dominant products are P1 (CFCl2CHO + HO2 + Cl). The yields of the other products are very low and insignificant for the title reaction. The total rate constants exhibit typical "falloff" behavior. The pathways on the triplet PES are less competitive than that on the singlet PES. The calculated overall rate constants are in good agreement with the experimental data. The atmospheric lifetime of CFCl2CH2O2 in ClO is around 2.04 h. TD-DFT calculations imply that IM1 (CFCl2CH2OOOCl), IM2 (CFCl2CH2OOClO) and IM3 (CFCl2CH2OClO2) will photolyze under sunlight.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflicts to declare.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Optimized geometries for all the intermediates and transition states at the B3LYP/6-311++G(d,p) level for the reaction between CFCl2CH2O2 and ClO. Bond distances are given in Å.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Optimized geometries (length in Å and angle in degree) for all the reactants and products at the B3LYP/6-311++G(d,p) level for the reaction between CFCl2CH2O2 and ClO. Angles are given in °, and bond distances are given in Å. The values in italics are experimental data from ref. 29.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. Potential energy surface obtained at the CCSD(T)//B3LYP level for the CFCl2CH2O2 + ClO reaction.
Scheme 1
Scheme 1. The primary pathways of the CFCl2CH2O2 + ClO reaction.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4. Plots of the rate coefficients for total and primary reaction channels versus 1000/T (K−1) at 200–1000 K associated with the available experimental value.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5. Predicted rate coefficients for the total reaction and each individual product pathway of the reaction between CFCl2CH2O2 and ClO at 200–3000 K and 10−10 to 1010 atm.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6. Predicted branching ratios for the CFCl2CH2O2 + ClO reaction at the low pressure limit, atmospheric pressure and high pressure limit.
Fig. 7
Fig. 7. Pressure dependence of the total rate coefficients for the CFCl2CH2O2 + ClO reaction at 298, 1000 and 3000 K.
Fig. 8
Fig. 8. Branching ratios for the CFCl2CH2O2 + ClO reaction at 10−14 to 1014 torr at 298, 1000 and 3000 K.

Similar articles

References

    1. Tuazon E. C. and Atkinson R., Potential Replacements for the Chlorofluorocarbons and Halons, American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, 1995
    1. Sehested J. Int. J. Chem. Kinet. 1994;26:1023–1039. doi: 10.1002/kin.550261007. - DOI
    1. Atkinson R. Baulch D. L. Cox R. A. Hampson Jr R. F. Kerr J. A. Rossi M. J. Troe J. J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data. 1997;26:521–1011. doi: 10.1063/1.556011. - DOI
    1. Lightfoot P. D. Cox R. A. Crowley J. N. Destriau M. Hayman G. D. Jenkin M. E. Moortgat G. K. Zabel F. Atmos. Environ., Part A. 1992;26:1805–1961. doi: 10.1016/0960-1686(92)90423-I. - DOI
    1. Wallington T. J. Nielsen O. J. Int. J. Chem. Kinet. 1991;23:785–798. doi: 10.1002/kin.550230905. - DOI