Visiting and Communication Policy in Intensive Care Units during COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-sectional Survey from South Asia and the Middle East

Gunjan Chanchalani¹, Nitin Arora², Prashant Nasa³, Kanwalpreet Sodhi⁴, Maher J Al Bahrani⁵, Ashraf Al Tayar⁶, Madiha Hashmi⁷, Vinod Jaiswal⁸, Sandeep Kantor⁹, Ahsina J Lopa¹⁰, Bassam Mansour¹¹, Anushka D Mudalige¹², Rashid Nadeem¹³, Gentle S Shrestha¹⁴, Ahmed R Taha¹⁵, Melda Türkoğlu¹⁶, Dameera Weeratunga¹⁷

Affiliations

¹ Department of Critical Care Medicine, Cumballa Hill Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
² Department of Intensive Care, University Hospitals Birmingham, Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom.
³ Department of Critical Care Medicine, NMC Specialty Hospital, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
⁴ Deep Hospital, Ludhiana, Punjab, India.
⁵ Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Royal Hospital, Muscat, Oman.
⁶ Department of ICU, Security Force Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia.
⁷ Department of Critical Care Medicine, Ziauddin University and Dr Ziauddin Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan.
⁸ Department of Critical Care Medicine, Amina Hospital, Ajman, United Arab Emirates.
⁹ Department of Critical Care Medicine, Royal Hospital, Muscat, Oman.
¹⁰ Department of Intensive Care Unit, MH Samorita Hospital and Medical College, Tejgaon, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
¹¹ Department of Pulmonary Medicine and Critical Care Medicine, Zahraa Hospital University Medical Center/Lebanese University, Faculty of Medical Science, Beirut, Lebanon.
¹² Department of Critical Care Medicine, North Colombo Teaching Hospital, Ragama, Sri Lanka.
¹³ Department of Critical Care Medicine, Dubai Hospital, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
¹⁴ Department of Critical Care Medicine, Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital, Lalitpur, Nepal.
¹⁵ Department of Critical Care Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
¹⁶ Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Critical Care, Gazi University, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
¹⁷ Department of Critical Care Medicine, National Hospital of Sri Lanka, Colombo, Sri Lanka.

PMID: 35519910
PMCID: PMC9015923
DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24091

Visiting and Communication Policy in Intensive Care Units during COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-sectional Survey from South Asia and the Middle East

Gunjan Chanchalani et al. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2022 Mar.

. 2022 Mar;26(3):268-275.

doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24091.

Authors

Affiliations

¹ Department of Critical Care Medicine, Cumballa Hill Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
² Department of Intensive Care, University Hospitals Birmingham, Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom.
³ Department of Critical Care Medicine, NMC Specialty Hospital, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
⁴ Deep Hospital, Ludhiana, Punjab, India.
⁵ Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Royal Hospital, Muscat, Oman.
⁶ Department of ICU, Security Force Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia.
⁷ Department of Critical Care Medicine, Ziauddin University and Dr Ziauddin Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan.
⁸ Department of Critical Care Medicine, Amina Hospital, Ajman, United Arab Emirates.
⁹ Department of Critical Care Medicine, Royal Hospital, Muscat, Oman.
¹⁰ Department of Intensive Care Unit, MH Samorita Hospital and Medical College, Tejgaon, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
¹¹ Department of Pulmonary Medicine and Critical Care Medicine, Zahraa Hospital University Medical Center/Lebanese University, Faculty of Medical Science, Beirut, Lebanon.
¹² Department of Critical Care Medicine, North Colombo Teaching Hospital, Ragama, Sri Lanka.
¹³ Department of Critical Care Medicine, Dubai Hospital, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
¹⁴ Department of Critical Care Medicine, Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital, Lalitpur, Nepal.
¹⁵ Department of Critical Care Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
¹⁶ Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Critical Care, Gazi University, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
¹⁷ Department of Critical Care Medicine, National Hospital of Sri Lanka, Colombo, Sri Lanka.

PMID: 35519910
PMCID: PMC9015923
DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24091

Abstract

Purpose: The coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic had affected the visiting or communicating policies for family members. We surveyed the intensive care units (ICUs) in South Asia and the Middle East to assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on visiting and communication policies.

Materials and method: A web-based cross-sectional survey was used to collect data between March 22, 2021, and April 7, 2021, from healthcare professionals (HCP) working in COVID and non-COVID ICUs (one response per ICU). The topics of the questionnaire included current and pre-pandemic policies on visiting, communication, informed consent, and end-of-life care in ICUs.

Results: A total of 292 ICUs (73% of COVID ICUs) from 18 countries were included in the final analysis. Most (92%) of ICUs restricted their visiting hours, and nearly one-third (32.3%) followed a "no-visitor" policy. There was a significant change in the daily visiting duration in COVID ICUs compared to the pre-pandemic times (p = 0.011). There was also a significant change (p <0.001) in the process of informed consent and end-of-life discussions during the ongoing pandemic compared to pre-pandemic times.

Conclusion: Visiting and communication policies of the ICUs had significantly changed during the COVID-19 pandemic. Future studies are needed to understand the sociopsychological and medicolegal implications of revised policies.

How to cite this article: Chanchalani G, Arora N, Nasa P, Sodhi K, Al Bahrani MJ, Al Tayar A, et al. Visiting and Communication Policy in Intensive Care Units during COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-sectional Survey from South Asia and the Middle East. Indian J Crit Care Med 2022;26(3):268-275.

Keywords: Communication barrier; Do not resuscitate orders; End-of-life care; Family communication; Informed consent; Informed consent document; Patient visitors; Terminal care; Visitors to patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Source of support: Nil Conflict of interest: None

Figures

**Fig. 1**
Geographical representation of the number of ICUs who participated in the cross-sectional survey. N represents the number of ICUs from each country; ICU, intensive care units

See this image and copyright information in PMC

Cited by

The Effect of Video Call with Family Members on Physiological Parameters of Critically Ill Patients in Intensive Care Unit: A Quasi-experimental Study.
Uysal N, Vaizoğlu D. Uysal N, et al. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2023 Oct;27(10):732-736. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24549. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2023. PMID: 37908419 Free PMC article.
Digitalizing informed consent in healthcare: a scoping review.
Goldschmitt M, Gleim P, Mandelartz S, Kellmeyer P, Rigotti T. Goldschmitt M, et al. BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Jul 2;25(1):893. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12964-7. BMC Health Serv Res. 2025. PMID: 40604763 Free PMC article.
Understanding the Challenges of Intensive Care Staff in Communicating With Patients and Patients' Families During the COVID-19 Crisis: A Qualitative Exploration.
Vaz M, D'Silva C, Krishna B, Ramachandran P, D'Souza MC, Mendonca L, Raman P. Vaz M, et al. Cureus. 2023 Jun 26;15(6):e40961. doi: 10.7759/cureus.40961. eCollection 2023 Jun. Cureus. 2023. PMID: 37503489 Free PMC article.
Visitors in the Intensive Care Unit in the COVID Era.
Kapadia FN, Pattanaik S. Kapadia FN, et al. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2022 Mar;26(3):251-252. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24160. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2022. PMID: 35519916 Free PMC article.
Variation in Communication and Family Visiting Policies in Italian Intensive Care Units during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Secondary Analysis of the COVISIT International Survey.
Simone B, Ippolito M, Iozzo P, Zuccaro F, Giarratano A, Cecconi M, Tabah A, Cortegiani A. Simone B, et al. Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Feb 24;11(5):669. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11050669. Healthcare (Basel). 2023. PMID: 36900674 Free PMC article.

See all "Cited by" articles

References

1. Kynoch K, Chang A, Coyer F, McArdle A. The effectiveness of interventions to meet family needs of critically ill patients in an adult intensive care unit: a systematic review update. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016;14(3):181–234. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-2477. - DOI - PubMed
1. Alfheim HB, Hofsø K, Småstuen MC, Tøien K, Rosseland LA, Rustøen T. Post-traumatic stress symptoms in family caregivers of intensive care unit patients: a longitudinal study. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2020;50:5–10. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2018.05.007. - DOI - PubMed
1. CoBaTrICE Collaboration. The views of patients and relatives of what makes a good intensivist: a European survey. Intensive Care Med. 2007;33:1913–1920. doi: 10.1007/s00134-007-0799-4. - DOI - PubMed
1. Azoulay E, Sprung CL. Family-physician interactions in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 2004;32(11):2323–2328. doi: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000145950.57614.04. - DOI - PubMed
1. Lee MD, Friedenberg AS, Mukpo DH, Conray K, Palmisciano A, Levy MM. Visiting hours policies in New England intensive care units: strategies for improvement. Crit Care Med. 2007;35(2):497–501. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000254338.87182.AC. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources

Full Text Sources
- Europe PubMed Central
- PubMed Central
Miscellaneous
- NCI CPTAC Assay Portal

Save citation to file

Email citation

Add to Collections

Add to My Bibliography

Your saved search

Create a file for external citation management software

Your RSS Feed

Visiting and Communication Policy in Intensive Care Units during COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-sectional Survey from South Asia and the Middle East

Affiliations

Visiting and Communication Policy in Intensive Care Units during COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-sectional Survey from South Asia and the Middle East

Authors

Affiliations

Abstract

Conflict of interest statement

Figures

Similar articles

Cited by

References

LinkOut - more resources

Full Text Sources

Miscellaneous