What makes administrative data "research-ready"? A systematic review and thematic analysis of published literature
- PMID: 35520099
- PMCID: PMC9052961
- DOI: 10.23889/ijpds.v6i1.1718
What makes administrative data "research-ready"? A systematic review and thematic analysis of published literature
Abstract
Introduction: Administrative data are a valuable research resource, but are under-utilised in the UK due to governance, technical and other barriers (e.g., the time and effort taken to gain secure data access). In recent years, there has been considerable government investment in making administrative data "research-ready", but there is no definition of what this term means. A common understanding of what constitutes research-ready administrative data is needed to establish clear principles and frameworks for their development and the realisation of their full research potential.
Objective: To define the characteristics of research-ready administrative data based on a systematic review and synthesis of existing literature.
Methods: On 29th June 2021, we systematically searched seven electronic databases for (1) peer-reviewed literature (2) related to research-ready administrative data (3) written in the English language. Following supplementary searches and snowball screening, we conducted a thematic analysis of the identified relevant literature.
Results: Overall, we screened 2,375 records and identified 38 relevant studies published between 2012 and 2021. Most related to administrative data from the UK and US and particularly to health data. The term research-ready was used inconsistently in the literature and there was some conflation with the concept of data being ready for statistical analysis. From the thematic analysis, we identified five defining characteristics of research-ready administrative data: (a) accessible, (b) broad, (c) curated, (d) documented and (e) enhanced for research purposes.
Conclusions: Our proposed characteristics of research-ready administrative data could act as a starting point to help data owners and researchers develop common principles and standards. In the more immediate term, the proposed characteristics are a useful framework for cataloguing existing research-ready administrative databases and relevant resources that can support their development.
Keywords: administrative data; research-ready; systematic review; thematic analysis.
Conflict of interest statement
Statements on conflicts of interest: None to be declared.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881. Med J Aust. 2020. PMID: 33314144
-
The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(3):80-129. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907030-00001. JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009. PMID: 27820426
-
Potential use of routine databases in health technology assessment.Health Technol Assess. 2005 May;9(20):1-92, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta9200. Health Technol Assess. 2005. PMID: 15899148 Review.
-
Quality of administrative health databases in Canada: A scoping review.Can J Public Health. 2016 Jun 27;107(1):e56-e61. doi: 10.17269/cjph.107.5244. Can J Public Health. 2016. PMID: 27348111 Free PMC article.
-
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12. Early Hum Dev. 2020. PMID: 33036834
Cited by
-
Identifying neurodevelopmental disabilities from nationalised preschool health check.Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2023 Aug;57(8):1140-1149. doi: 10.1177/00048674231151606. Epub 2023 Feb 6. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2023. PMID: 36748102 Free PMC article.
-
CIDACS' efforts towards an inclusive and dialogic data governance in Brazil: a focused literature review.Int J Popul Data Sci. 2024 Mar 13;9(1):2163. doi: 10.23889/ijpds.v9i1.2163. eCollection 2024. Int J Popul Data Sci. 2024. PMID: 39620118 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Using administrative data to evaluate national policy impacts on child and maternal health: a research framework from the Maternal and Child Health Network (MatCHNet).J Epidemiol Community Health. 2023 Nov;77(11):710-713. doi: 10.1136/jech-2023-220621. Epub 2023 Jul 18. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2023. PMID: 37463771 Free PMC article.
-
Leveraging Administrative Health Databases to Address Health Challenges in Farming Populations: Scoping Review and Bibliometric Analysis (1975-2024).JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2025 Jan 9;11:e62939. doi: 10.2196/62939. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2025. PMID: 39787587 Free PMC article.
-
Using collective intelligence methods to improve government data infrastructures and promote the use of complex data: The example of the Northern Ireland Longitudinal Study.Health Res Policy Syst. 2023 Dec 18;21(1):134. doi: 10.1186/s12961-023-01070-x. Health Res Policy Syst. 2023. PMID: 38111046 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- ADR UK. Annual Report 2018–19 Administrative data is an invaluable resource for public good. Let’s use it. [Internet]. Swindon, UK.: 2019. Available from: tinyurl.com/bmfwwekr
-
- Drake B, Jonson-Reid M. Some Thoughts on the Increasing Use of Administrative Data in Child Maltreatment Research. Child Maltreat. 1999;4:308–15. 10.1177/1077559599004004004 - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources