Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jun 6;9(31):17698-17705.
doi: 10.1039/c9ra02460c. eCollection 2019 Jun 4.

A novel ultrasensitive surface plasmon resonance-based nanosensor for nitrite detection

Affiliations

A novel ultrasensitive surface plasmon resonance-based nanosensor for nitrite detection

Pandeng Miao et al. RSC Adv. .

Abstract

Nitrite is a common food additive, however, its reduction product, nitrosamine, is a strong carcinogen, and hence the ultra-sensitive detection of nitrite is an effective means to prevent related cancers. In this study, different sized gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) were modified with P-aminothiophenol (ATP) and naphthylethylenediamine (NED). In the presence of nitrite, satellite-like AuNPs aggregates formed via the diazotization coupling reaction and the color of the system was changed by the functionalized AuNPs aggregates. The carcinogenic nitrite content could be detected by colorimetry according to the change in the system color. The linear concentration range of sodium nitrite was 0-1.0 μg mL-1 and the detection limit was determined to be 3.0 ng mL-1. Compared with the traditional method, this method has the advantages of high sensitivity, low detection limit, good selectivity and can significantly lower the naked-eye detection limit to 3.0 ng mL-1. In addition, this method is suitable for the determination of nitrite in various foods. We think this novel designed highly sensitive nitrate nanosensor holds great market potential.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflicts to declare.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. The schematic of NO2 detection by Au satellite-like aggregate colorimetry.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Characterization of ATP-AuNPs. (A) The absorption was monitored at 567 nm for citrate-protected AuNPs etched by ATP at different concentrations. The inset cartoons represent the changing of ATP ligand numbers capped on AuNPs. (B) The zeta potential (ζ) change before and after ATP conjugation to AuNPs. (C) The hydrodynamic size change before and after ATP conjugation to AuNPs. (D) UV absorption and colour change (inset) before and after ATP conjugation to AuNPs.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. Characterization, covalent conjugation and nitrite detection of NG-AuNPs. (A) UV-vis absorption spectrum of G-AuNP. (B) Size distribution of G-AuNPs measured by DLS. (C) Agarose gel electrophoresis of G-AuNPs and citrate-protected AuNPs. (D) Brief description of the detection principle of the system. (E) Absorption spectra of NO2 with gradient concentrations in the system. (F) The raw 567 nm-absorbance plot in a larger concentration range. (G) Plot of 567 nm-absorbance with a linear fit (red line) function (y = 0.7204x + 0.0037, where y is the 567 nm-absorbance and x is the concentration of NO2).
Fig. 4
Fig. 4. The sensitivity and selectivity of the sensing system. (A) Colorimetric changes of the sensing system in the presence of NO2 (1.0 μg mL−1) under different pH conditions. (B) The ionic selectivity test of the sensing system; inset is the absorbance at 567 nm monitored with the addition of equimolar ions.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5. Application of the nanosensor to nitrite detection for samples of bread (A), milk (B), pork luncheon meat (C), ham (D) and spicy cabbage (E). The photos are of the real tested samples and the plots below are 567 nm-absorbance against the food exposure time in a −4 °C refrigerator. The comparisons of chromogenic effects between the new method and traditional method are shown in both photos and plots. (F) The standard detection plot derived from the traditional detection method showed a detection limit of 0.06 g mL−1.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Siegel R. Naishadham D. Jemal A. Ca-Cancer J. Clin. 2013;63:11–30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21166. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fredj Z. Azzouzi S. Turner A. P. F. Ali M. B. Mak W. C. Sens. Actuators, B. 2017;248:77–84. doi: 10.1016/j.snb.2017.03.160. - DOI
    1. Turner C. P. Carlile W. R. Acta Hortic. 1982;126:213–218. doi: 10.17660/ActaHortic.1982.126.26. - DOI
    1. Zhong R. Liu Y. Zhang P. Liu J. Zhao G. Zhang F. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2014;6:19465–19470. doi: 10.1021/am506497s. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Liu Y. Zhong R. Zhang P. Ma Y. Yun X. Gong P. Wei J. Zhao X. Zhang F. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2016;8:2478–2485. doi: 10.1021/acsami.5b08386. - DOI - PubMed