Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Aug 24;10(52):31295-31304.
doi: 10.1039/d0ra04985a. eCollection 2020 Aug 21.

Biofilm formation potential and chlorine resistance of typical bacteria isolated from drinking water distribution systems

Affiliations

Biofilm formation potential and chlorine resistance of typical bacteria isolated from drinking water distribution systems

Zebing Zhu et al. RSC Adv. .

Abstract

Biofilms are the main carrier of microbial communities throughout drinking water distribution systems (DWDSs), and strongly affect the safety of drinking water. Understanding biofilm formation potential and chlorine resistance is necessary for exploring future disinfection strategies and preventing water-borne diseases. This study investigated biofilm formation of five bacterial strains isolated from a simulated DWDS at different incubation times (24 h, 48 h, and 72 h), then evaluated chlorine resistance of 72 h incubated biofilms under chlorine concentrations of 0.3, 0.6, 1, 2, 4, and 10 mg L-1. All five bacterial strains had biofilm formation potential when incubated for 72 h. The biofilm formation potential of Acinetobacter sp. was stronger than that of Bacillus cereus, Microbacterium sp. and Sphingomonas sp. were moderate, and that of Acidovorax sp. was weak. In contrast, the order of chlorine resistance was Bacillus sp. > Sphingomonas sp. > Microbacterium sp. > Acidovorax sp. > Acinetobacter sp. Thus, the chlorine resistance of a single-species biofilm has little relation with the biofilm formation potential. The biofilm biomass is not a major factor affecting chlorine resistance. Moreover, the chlorine resistance of a single-species biofilm is highly related to the physiological state of bacterial cells, such as their ability to form spores or secrete extracellular polymeric substances, which could reduce the sensitivity of the single-species biofilm to a disinfectant or otherwise protect the biofilm.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Biofilm biomass of single-species at different incubation times. The average error bar percentages are 35.11% for Acidovorax defluvii, 31.30% for Acinetobacter sp., 25.08% for Bacillus cereus, 28.42% for Microbacterium laevaniformans, and 38.60% for Sphingomonas sp.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Specific respiratory activity of single-species biofilm at different incubation times. The average error bar percentages are 44.73% for Acidovorax defluvii, 35.23% for Acinetobacter sp., 20.20% for Bacillus cereus, 41.86% for Microbacterium laevaniformans, and 25.85% for Sphingomonas sp.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. Bacterial counts (HPC) of single-species biofilm at 72 h incubation time. The average error bar percentages are 49.20% for Acidovorax defluvii, 38.82% for Acinetobacter sp., 46.62% for Bacillus cereus, 43.89% for Microbacterium laevaniformans, and 46.70% for Sphingomonas sp.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4. Biofilm biomass reduction of single-species at different chlorine concentrations. The average error bar percentages are 2.30% for Acidovorax defluvii, 1.52% for Acinetobacter sp., 13.13% for Bacillus cereus, 3.95% for Microbacterium laevaniformans, and 6.29% for Sphingomonas sp.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5. Biofilm activity reduction of single-species at different chlorine concentrations. The average error bar percentages are 12.24% for Acidovorax defluvii, 5.38% for Acinetobacter sp., 1.40% for Bacillus cereus, 4.35% for Microbacterium laevaniformans, and 8.31% for Sphingomonas sp.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6. Inactivation rate of single-species biofilm at different chlorine concentrations. The average error bar percentages are 14.65% for Acidovorax defluvii, 16.50% for Acinetobacter sp., 34.80% for Bacillus cereus, 21.21% for Microbacterium laevaniformans, and 30.46% for Sphingomonas sp.
Fig. 7
Fig. 7. Vegetative cell counts and spore counts of Bacillus cereus, and proportion of spores before and after disinfection. The average error bar percentages are 28.67% for vegetative cells, and 35.83% for spores.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Liu G. Zhang Y. van der Mark E. Magic-Knezev A. Pinto A. van den Bogert B. Liu W. van der Meer W. Medema G. Water Res. 2018;138:86–96. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2018.03.043. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gomes I. B. Simoes L. C. Simoes M. RSC Adv. 2019;9:32184–32196. doi: 10.1039/C9RA05880J. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Liu G. Bakker G. L. Li S. Vreeburg J. H. G. Verberk J. Q. J. C. Medema G. J. Liu W. T. Van Dijk J. C. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014;48:5467–5476. doi: 10.1021/es5009467. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bimakr F. Ginige M. P. Kaksonen A. H. Sutton D. C. Puzon G. J. Cheng K. Y. Sens. Actuators, B. 2018;277:526–534. doi: 10.1016/j.snb.2018.09.005. - DOI
    1. Makris K. C. Andra S. S. Botsaris G. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014;44:1477–1523. doi: 10.1080/10643389.2013.790746. - DOI