Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Mar 29;9(18):10081-10090.
doi: 10.1039/c9ra00719a. eCollection 2019 Mar 28.

Preparation and biocompatibility of Fe50Ni50p/HAP/PEEK biocomposites with weak magnetic properties

Affiliations

Preparation and biocompatibility of Fe50Ni50p/HAP/PEEK biocomposites with weak magnetic properties

Dengyu Liu et al. RSC Adv. .

Abstract

Hydroxyapatite (HAP)/polyetheretherketone (PEEK) composites are widely used in the new generation of bone implant materials. The use of weak magnetic fields can promote the biocompatibility of PEEK materials. In this paper, Fe50Ni50 alloy nanopowders and Fe50Ni50/HAP/PEEK composites were prepared by liquid phase chemical reduction and liquid phase mixing. The prepared Fe50Ni50 alloy nanopowders have a particle size of about 100 nm and good chemical activity and magnetic properties. The saturation magnetization (M s) of the Fe50Ni50 alloy powders is 70 emu g-1. Fe50Ni50 nano-powders in Fe50Ni50/HAP/PEEK composites are uniformly distributed in the matrix in the form of individual particles, achieving nano-level dispersion. With the increase of Fe50Ni50 alloy powders content, the magnetic properties of the composites are significantly enhanced. The biocompatibility of Fe50Ni50/HAP/PEEK composites is significantly better than that of PEEK and HAP/PEEK materials. The 2% Fe50Ni50/HAP/PEEK composite has the best comprehensive performance, and its biocompatibility is good. The contact angle is only 55.85°. The M s reaches 1.5 emu g-1 and the hardness reaches 42 HBa.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflicts to declare.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Schematic diagram of reaction.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. XRD diagram of FeNi powders.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. SEM image of Fe50Ni50 powders.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4. Mixing of Fe50Ni50 powders in HAP/PEEK powders before molding.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5. Dispersion of Fe50Ni50 powders in matrix after molding.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6. CV curves of Fe50Ni50 at a scan rate of 0.1 V s−1.
Fig. 7
Fig. 7. The water contact angle (degrees) of PEEK, HAP/PEEK composites, FeNi/HAP/PEEK composites.
Fig. 8
Fig. 8. SEM images of the surface of (a) PEEK, (b) HAP/PEEK composite, (c) 2% Fe50Ni50/HA/PEEK composite and (d) 5% Fe50Ni50/HA/PEEK composite after 7 days of immersion in SBF solution.
Fig. 9
Fig. 9. Energy spectrum diagram of (a) PEEK, (b) HAP/PEEK composite, (c) 2% Fe50Ni50/HAP/PEEK composite and (d) 5% Fe50Ni50/HAP/PEEK composite after 7 days of immersion in SBF solution.
Fig. 10
Fig. 10. The formation of apatite.
Fig. 11
Fig. 11. The dependency of strain to failure on Fe50Ni50% in the HAP/PEEK composites.
Fig. 12
Fig. 12. The Hardness of PEEK, HAP/PEEK composites, FeNi/HAP/PEEK composites.
Fig. 13
Fig. 13. Room temperature hysteresis loop of pure Fe50Ni50 powders.
Fig. 14
Fig. 14. Room temperature hysteresis loop of Fe3O4.
Fig. 15
Fig. 15. Room temperature hysteresis loop of HAP/PEEK composite with 2% Fe50Ni50 powders and 5% Fe50Ni50 powders.
Fig. 16
Fig. 16. Magnetically permeable powders forms a pathway in the resin matrix.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Schmitz J. P. Hollinger J. O. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 1986:299–308. - PubMed
    1. Bauer T. W. Muschler G. F. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2000:10–27. doi: 10.1097/00003086-200002000-00003. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kurtz S. M. Devine J. N. Biomaterials. 2007;28:4845–4869. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.07.013. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jaekel D. J. MacDonald D. W. Kurtz S. M. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2011;4:1275–1282. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2011.04.014. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Arif M. F. Kumar S. Varadarajan K. M. Cantwell W. J. Mater. Des. 2018;146:249–259. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2018.03.015. - DOI