Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Mar 6;7(1):17-25.
doi: 10.1136/bmjstel-2019-000526. eCollection 2021.

Development and impact of an endoscopic non-technical skills (ENTS) behavioural marker system

Srivathsan Ravindran  1   2 , Adam Haycock  2   3 , Katherine Woolf  4 , Siwan Thomas-Gibson  2   3
Affiliations

Development and impact of an endoscopic non-technical skills (ENTS) behavioural marker system

Srivathsan Ravindran et al. BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn. .

Abstract

Background: Non-technical skills (NTS) are crucial to effective team working in endoscopy. Training in NTS has been shown to improve team performance and patient outcomes. As such, NTS training and assessment are now considered essential components of the endoscopy quality assurance process. Across the literature, other specialties have achieved this through development of behavioural marker systems (BMS). BMS provide a framework for assessing, training and measuring the NTS relevant to healthcare individuals and team. This article describes the development and impact of a novel BMS for endoscopy: the endoscopic non-technical skills (ENTS) system.

Methods: The initial NTS taxonomy for endoscopy was created through a combination of literature review, staff focus groups and semi-structured interviews, incorporating the critical decision method. Framework analysis was conducted with three individual coders and generated a skills list which formed the preliminary taxonomy. Video observation of Bowel Cancer Screening endoscopists was used to identify exemplar behaviours which were mapped to relevant skills in the NTS taxonomy. Behavioural descriptors, derived from video data, were added to form the basis of the ENTS system.

Results: A taxonomy of 33 skills in 14 separate categories were identified through framework analysis. Following video analysis and behaviour mapping, 4 overarching categories and 13 behavioural elements were identified which formed the ENTS framework. The endoscopy (directly observed procedural skills) 4-point rating scale was added to create the final ENTS system. Since its development in 2010, the ENTS system has been validated in the assessment of endoscopy for trainees nationally. ENTS informs a number of training initiatives, including a national strategy to improve NTS for all endoscopists.

Conclusions: The ENTS system is a clinically relevant tool, validated for use in trainee assessment. The use of ENTS will be important to the future of training and quality assurance in endoscopy.

Keywords: assessment; behavioural marker system; endoscopy; non-technical skills; training.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: KW reports grants from National Institute for Health Research, non-financial support and other from Royal Colleges of Physicians (UK), other from Health Education England, grants and other from General Medical Council, outside the submitted work. ST-G reports educational grants from Norgine, Aquilant and Olympus.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study schematic. ENTS, endoscopic non-technical skills.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Knowledge audit.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Flin R, Maran N. Identifying and training non-technical skills for teams in acute medicine. Qual Saf Health Care 2004;13(Suppl 1):i80–4. 10.1136/qshc.2004.009993 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cullinane M. Scoping our practice: the 2004 report of the National Confidential enquiry into patient outcome and death, 2004. Available: https://www.ncepod.org.uk/2004report/index.htm [Accessed 15 Jun 18].
    1. Schmutz J, Manser T. Do team processes really have an effect on clinical performance? A systematic literature review. Br J Anaesth 2013;110:529–44. 10.1093/bja/aes513 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Haycock A, Matharoo MK, Thomas-Gibson S. Effective teamworking in gastroenterology. Frontline Gastroenterol 2012;3:86–9. 10.1136/flgastro-2011-100048 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dietz AS, Pronovost PJ, Benson KN, et al. . A systematic review of behavioural marker systems in healthcare: what do we know about their attributes, validity and application? BMJ Qual Saf 2014;23:1031–9. 10.1136/bmjqs-2013-002457 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources