Processing speed, but not working memory or global cognition, is associated with pupil diameter during fixation
- PMID: 35521807
- DOI: 10.1111/psyp.14089
Processing speed, but not working memory or global cognition, is associated with pupil diameter during fixation
Abstract
Mean pupil size during fixation has been suggested to reflect interindividual differences in working memory and fluid intelligence. However, due to small samples with limited age range (17-35 years) and suboptimal light conditions in previous studies, these associations are still controversial and it is unclear whether they are observed at older ages. Therefore, we assessed whether interindividual differences in cognitive performance are reflected in pupil diameter during fixation and whether these associations are age-dependent. We analyzed pupillometry and cognition data of 4560 individuals aged 30-95 years of the community-based Rhineland Study. Pupillometry data were extracted from a one-minute fixation task. The cognitive test battery included tests of oculomotor control, working memory, episodic verbal memory, processing speed, executive function, and crystallized intelligence. For data analysis, we used multivariable regression models. Working memory and global cognition were not associated with pupil diameter during fixation. Better processing speed performance was associated with larger pupil diameter during fixation. Associations between cognition and pupil diameter during fixation hardly varied with age, but pupil diameter during fixation declined linearly with age (adjusted decline: 0.33 mm per 10 years of age). There were no significant sex differences in pupil size. We conclude that interindividual differences in mean pupil diameter during fixation may partly reflect interindividual differences in the speed of processing and response generation. We could not confirm that interindividual differences in working memory and fluid intelligence are reflected in pupil size during fixation; however, our sample differed in age range from previous studies.
Keywords: age; cognition; cohort studies; intelligence; pupillometry.
© 2022 The Authors. Psychophysiology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society for Psychophysiological Research.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Althouse, A. D. (2016). Adjust for multiple comparisons? It's not that simple. Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 101(5), 1644-1645. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.11.024
-
- Bangasser, D. A., Eck, S. R., Telenson, A. M., & Salvatore, M. (2011). Sex differences in stress regulation of arousal and cognition. Physiology & Behavior, 103(3-4), 342-351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2011.02.037
-
- Bangasser, D. A., Wiersielis, K. R., & Khantsis, S. (2016). Sex differences in the locus coeruleus-norepinephrine system and its regulation by stress. Brain Research, 1641, 177-188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2015.11.021
-
- Beatty, J., & Lucero-Wagoner, B. (2000). The pupillary system. In J. T. Cacioppo, L. G. Tassinary, & G. G. Berntson (Eds.), Handbook of psychophysiology (2nd ed., pp. 142-162). Cambridge University Press.
-
- Boenniger, M. M., Staerk, C., Coors, A., Huijbers, W., Ettinger, U., & Breteler, M. M. B. (2021). Ten parallel German versions of Rey's auditory verbal learning test: Age and sex effects in 4,000 adults of the Rhineland study. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 43(6), 637-653. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803395.2021.1984398
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
