Morbidities and prognostic factors after tibial pilon fracture: impact on patients
- PMID: 35522317
- DOI: 10.1007/s00402-022-04456-8
Morbidities and prognostic factors after tibial pilon fracture: impact on patients
Abstract
Introduction: This study aims primarily to characterize the sequelae and morbidity associated with tibial pilon injuries from the patients' perspectives in terms of multiple surgical interventions, duration of hospital stay, downtime from work, loss of productivity and impact on patients' lives. The secondary aim is to review the associated risk factors for these morbidities.
Materials and methods: All patients with surgically treated tibial pilon fractures from 1st July 2007 to 30th June 2017 were included. The morbidities reviewed focused on delay to surgery, numbers of surgeries, limb amputation, length of stay (LOS), readmissions, duration of medical leave (ML), follow-up and number of outpatient visits.
Results: There were 102 patients included in the review and up to 70% of them had an average 7 days delay to definitive surgery. They also required an average hospital LOS of at least 2 weeks extending up to 3 more weeks if soft tissue reconstruction was necessitated. Up to a third of patients were readmitted with 15% of them needing further treatment. These patients required a notable period of downtime from work as shown in the long ML (mean 152.6 days [S.D. = 110.7]). Multiple conditional regression models showed AO/OTA classification (B and C) and open fracture as independent predictors of delay to surgery. Predictors for increased LOS were high velocity mechanism of injury at 4 days longer and patients who needed soft tissue reconstruction at 21 days longer. In terms of downtime from work, only work injury has been identified as an independent predictor of ML at 88.5 days longer.
Conclusion: Tibial pilon fractures leads to significant morbidities with profound negative impact on patients' lives in terms of multiple surgical interventions required, prolonged hospital stay, need for readmissions and prolonged downtime from work. These morbidities from patients' perspective should be emphasized to patients and employers to manage their expectations and potential limitations.
Keywords: Impact; Morbidity; Patient perspective; Pilon fracture; Prognostic factor; Sequela.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Similar articles
-
Distal tibial pilon fractures (AO/OTA type B, and C) treated with the external skeletal and minimal internal fixation method.Vojnosanit Pregl. 2013 Sep;70(9):836-41. doi: 10.2298/vsp1309836m. Vojnosanit Pregl. 2013. PMID: 24266311
-
A staged protocol for soft tissue management in the treatment of complex pilon fractures.J Orthop Trauma. 2004 Sep;18(8 Suppl):S32-8. doi: 10.1097/00005131-200409001-00005. J Orthop Trauma. 2004. PMID: 15472563
-
A staged protocol for soft tissue management in the treatment of complex pilon fractures.J Orthop Trauma. 1999 Feb;13(2):78-84. doi: 10.1097/00005131-199902000-00002. J Orthop Trauma. 1999. PMID: 10052780
-
[Fractures of the tibial pilon. Long-term retrospective study of 51 fractures treated with open reduction and osteosynthesis].Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 1998 Apr;84(2):180-8. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 1998. PMID: 9775062 Review. French.
-
Hybrid external fixation of tibial pilon fractures.Foot Ankle Clin. 2000 Dec;5(4):853-71. Foot Ankle Clin. 2000. PMID: 11232472 Review.
Cited by
-
Contemporary Long-Term Patient Reported Outcomes of Pilon Fractures.ANZ J Surg. 2025 Jun;95(6):1247-1252. doi: 10.1111/ans.70164. Epub 2025 May 10. ANZ J Surg. 2025. PMID: 40346941 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Legallois Y, Baudelle F, Lavignac P, Garcia M, Meynard P, Cadennes A, Ribes C, Fabre T (2021) Tibial pilon fractures treated with a periarticular external fixator: retrospective study of 47 cases. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 13:103148
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical