How much do government and households spend on an episode of hospitalisation in India? A comparison for public and private hospitals in Chhattisgarh state
- PMID: 35522382
- PMCID: PMC9078002
- DOI: 10.1186/s13561-022-00372-0
How much do government and households spend on an episode of hospitalisation in India? A comparison for public and private hospitals in Chhattisgarh state
Abstract
Background: Improvements in the financing of healthcare services are important for developing countries like India to make progress towards universal health coverage. Inpatient-care contributes to a big share of total health expenditure in India. India has a mixed health-system with a sizeable presence of private hospitals. Existing studies show that out-of-pocket expenditure (OOPE) incurred per hospitalisation in private hospitals was greater than public facilities. But, such comparisons have not taken into account the healthcare spending by government.
Methods: For a valid comparison between public and for-profit private providers, this study in Indian state of Chhattisgarh assessed the combined spending by government and households per episode of hospitalisation. The supply-side and demand-side spending from public and private sources was taken into account. The study used two datasets: a) household survey for data on hospital utilisation, OOPE, cash incentives received by patients and claims raised under publicly funded health insurance (PFHI) schemes (n = 903 hospitalisation episodes) b) survey of public facilities to find supply-side government spending per hospitalisation (n = 64 facilities).
Results: Taking into account all relevant demand and supply side expenditures, the average total spending per day of hospitalisation was INR 2833 for public hospitals and INR 6788 for private hospitals. Adjusted model for logarithmic transformation of OOPE while controlling for variables including case-mix showed that a hospitalisation in private hospitals was significantly more expensive than public hospitals (coefficient = 2.9, p < 0.001). Hospitalisations in private hospitals were more likely to result in a PFHI claim (adjusted-odds-ratio = 1.45, p = 0.02) and involve a greater amount than public hospitals (coefficient = 0.27, p < 0.001). Propensity-score matching models confirmed the above results. Overall, supply-side public spending contributed to 16% of total spending, demand-side spending through PFHI to 16%, cash incentives to 1% and OOPE to 67%. OOPE constituted 31% of total spending per episode in public and 86% in private hospitals.
Conclusions: Government and households put together spent substantially more per hospitalisation in private hospitals than public hospitals in Chhattisgarh. This has important implications for the allocative efficiency and the desired public-private provider-mix. Using public resources for purchasing inpatient care services from private providers may not be a suitable strategy for such contexts.
Keywords: Demand-side spending; Efficiency; Health expenditure; India; Provider mix; Purchasing; Supply-side spending; UHC; Universal health coverage.
© 2022. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that there are no competing interests.
Similar articles
-
Role of publicly funded health insurance in financial protection of the elderly from hospitalisation expenditure in India-findings from the longitudinal aging study.BMC Geriatr. 2022 Jul 12;22(1):572. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-03266-2. BMC Geriatr. 2022. PMID: 35820859 Free PMC article.
-
Comparing the average cost of outpatient care of public and for-profit private providers in India.BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Aug 19;21(1):838. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06777-7. BMC Health Serv Res. 2021. PMID: 34407808 Free PMC article.
-
Household expenditure on non-Covid hospitalisation care during the Covid-19 pandemic and the role of financial protection policies in India.Arch Public Health. 2022 Apr 2;80(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s13690-022-00857-8. Arch Public Health. 2022. PMID: 35366948 Free PMC article.
-
Hong Kong's domestic health spending--financial years 1989/90 through 2004/05.Hong Kong Med J. 2008 Apr;14 Suppl 2:2-23. Hong Kong Med J. 2008. PMID: 18587162 Review.
-
Importance of Evidence-Based Health Insurance Reimbursement and Health Technology Assessment for Achieving Universal Health Coverage and Improved Access to Health in India.Value Health Reg Issues. 2021 May;24:24-30. doi: 10.1016/j.vhri.2020.04.007. Epub 2021 Jan 18. Value Health Reg Issues. 2021. PMID: 33476860 Review.
Cited by
-
Does government health insurance protect households from out of pocket expenditure and distress financing for caesarean and non-caesarean institutional deliveries in India? Findings from the national family health survey (2019-21).BMC Res Notes. 2023 May 22;16(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s13104-023-06335-w. BMC Res Notes. 2023. PMID: 37217964 Free PMC article.
-
Cost of Care for Non-communicable Diseases: Which Types of Healthcare Providers are the Most Economical in India's Chhattisgarh State?Pharmacoecon Open. 2024 Jul;8(4):599-609. doi: 10.1007/s41669-024-00489-4. Epub 2024 Apr 17. Pharmacoecon Open. 2024. PMID: 38630363 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Barber SL, Lorenzoni L, Ong P. Price Setting and Price Regulation in Health Care. Price Setting and Price Regulation in Health Care: World Health Organization; 2019. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/325547
-
- Bahuguna P, Guinness L, Sharma S, Chauhan AS, Downey L, Prinja S. Estimating the unit costs of healthcare service delivery in India: addressing information gaps for Price setting and health technology assessment. Appl health econ health policy. 2020;18(5):699–711. doi: 10.1007/s40258-020-00566-9. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- National Health Systems Resource Centre. National Health Accounts Estimates for India: 2016–17. New Delhi; 2019. Accessed 6 Apr 2021
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources