Variation of Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Techniques: a Survey of 518 Bariatric Surgeons
- PMID: 35522385
- DOI: 10.1007/s11695-022-06087-9
Variation of Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Techniques: a Survey of 518 Bariatric Surgeons
Abstract
Introduction: Surgical technique varies dramatically in the performance of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) and these differences can potentially lead to variation in outcomes. The objective of this study was to characterize surgical techniques used during LRYGB.
Methods: An anonymous 44-question survey was distributed by email to all bariatric surgeons with membership in the ASMBS, SAGES, and ACS from April to June 2020. Questions were designed to evaluate surgeon demographics, experience, and variation of techniques. Only surgeons who performed LRYGB within the past year were included for analysis.
Results: A total of 534 (18.8%) surgeons responded and the majority (97.0%) reported performing LRYGB in the past year. Surgeons were predominantly from the USA (77.8%). For preoperative work-up, 20.1% performed upper gastrointestinal series while 60.8% performed esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Limb length evaluation revealed mean Roux and biliopancreatic limb lengths of 124.1 ± 29.4 cm and 67.4 ± 32.2 cm, respectively. The gastrojejunostomy was most commonly formed using a linear stapler with handsewn closure of the common enterotomy (53.1%) and the jejunojejunostomy using a linear stapled anastomotic technique with handsewn closure of the common enterotomy (60.6%). The majority of surgeons closed the jejunojejunostomy mesenteric defect (91.1%) and one of the antecolic or retrocolic mesenteric defects (65.1%). Intraoperative leak tests were performed in 95.9% of cases. Only 22.1% of surgeons routinely performed upper gastrointestinal swallow studies postoperatively.
Conclusions: There are wide variations in pre- and intraoperative practice patterns for LRYGB. Further clinical trials designed to evaluate the impact of these practice pattern differences on patient outcomes are warranted.
Keywords: Bariatric surgery; Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass; Surgical techniques.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
Similar articles
-
Laparoscopic antecolic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass with closure of internal defects leads to fewer internal hernias than the retrocolic approach.Surg Endosc. 2008 Sep;22(9):2056-61. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-9749-7. Epub 2008 Feb 13. Surg Endosc. 2008. PMID: 18270773 Review.
-
Techniques of laparoscopic gastric bypass: on-line survey of American Society for Bariatric Surgery practicing surgeons.Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2008 Mar-Apr;4(2):166-72; discussion 172-3. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2007.08.006. Epub 2007 Dec 19. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2008. PMID: 18069071
-
Gastrojejunostomy stricture rate: comparison between antecolic and retrocolic laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015 Sep-Oct;11(5):1076-84. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2015.01.019. Epub 2015 Feb 2. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015. PMID: 25892346
-
The mesenteric defects in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: 5 years follow-up of non-closure versus closure using the stapler technique.Surg Endosc. 2017 Sep;31(9):3743-3748. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5415-2. Epub 2017 Feb 15. Surg Endosc. 2017. PMID: 28205037 Free PMC article.
-
Meta-analysis of hand-sewn versus mechanical gastrojejunal anastomosis during laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity.Int J Surg. 2016 Aug;32:150-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.04.024. Epub 2016 Apr 21. Int J Surg. 2016. PMID: 27107663 Review.
Cited by
-
Comparing the effect of laparoscopic and robotic stapling on clinical outcomes, efficiency, and costs of robot-assisted Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.J Robot Surg. 2025 Feb 8;19(1):65. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02223-6. J Robot Surg. 2025. PMID: 39921831 Free PMC article.
-
Mesenteric Defect Closure and the Rate of Internal Hernia in Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Obes Surg. 2023 Jul;33(7):2229-2236. doi: 10.1007/s11695-023-06597-0. Epub 2023 May 10. Obes Surg. 2023. PMID: 37162714
-
Do all roads lead to Rome?: A retrospective analysis on surgical technique in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.Surg Endosc. 2023 Sep;37(9):7254-7263. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10257-w. Epub 2023 Jul 6. Surg Endosc. 2023. PMID: 37415013
-
Counting Limb Length Ratios in Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: A Demonstration of Safety and Feasibility Using a 25-Patient Case Series in a High-Volume Academic Center.J Clin Med. 2025 Jul 25;14(15):5262. doi: 10.3390/jcm14155262. J Clin Med. 2025. PMID: 40806884 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Trogdon JG, Finkelstein EA, Hylands T, et al. Indirect costs of obesity: a review of the current literature. Obes Rev. 2008;9(5):489–500. - DOI
-
- Gloy VL, Briel M, Bhatt DL, et al. Bariatric surgery versus non-surgical treatment for obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 2013;22(347):f5934. - DOI
-
- Müller-Stich BP, Senft JD, Warschkow R, et al. Surgical versus medical treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus in nonseverely obese patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 2015;261(3):421–9. - DOI
-
- Cohen RV, Pereira TV, Aboud CM, et al. Effect of gastric bypass vs best medical treatment on early-stage chronic kidney disease in patients with type 2 diabetes and obesity: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Surg. 2020;155(8):e200420. - DOI
-
- Kizy S, Jahansouz C, Downey MC, et al. National trends in bariatric surgery 2012–2015: demographics, procedure selection, readmissions, and cost. Obes Surg. 2017;27(11):2933–9.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous