Review of Cerebrospinal Fluid Physiology and Dynamics: A Call for Medical Education Reform
- PMID: 35522666
- DOI: 10.1227/neu.0000000000002000
Review of Cerebrospinal Fluid Physiology and Dynamics: A Call for Medical Education Reform
Abstract
Background: The flow of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) has been described as a unidirectional system with the choroid plexus serving as the primary secretor of CSF and the arachnoid granulations as primary reabsorption site. This theory of neurosurgical forefathers has been universally adopted and taught as dogma. Many neuroscientists have found difficulty reconciling this theory with common pathologies, and recent studies have found that this "classic" hypothesis may not represent the full picture.
Objective: To review modern CSF dynamic theories and to call for medical education reform.
Methods: We reviewed the literature from January 1990 to December 2020. We searched the PubMed database using key terms "cerebrospinal fluid circulation," "cerebrospinal fluid dynamics," "cerebrospinal fluid physiology," "glymphatic system," and "glymphatic pathway." We selected articles with a primary aim to discuss either CSF dynamics and/or the glymphatic system.
Results: The Bulat-Klarica-Orešković hypothesis purports that CSF is secreted and reabsorbed throughout the craniospinal axis. CSF demonstrates similar physiology to that of water elsewhere in the body. CSF "circulates" throughout the subarachnoid space in a pulsatile to-and-fro fashion. Osmolarity plays a critical role in CSF dynamics. Aquaporin-4 and the glymphatic system contribute to CSF volume and flow by establishing osmolarity gradients and facilitating CSF movement. Multiple studies demonstrate that the choroid plexus does not play any significant role in CSF circulation.
Conclusion: We have highlighted major studies to illustrate modern principles of CSF dynamics. Despite these, the medical education system has been slow to reform curricula and update learning resources.
Copyright © Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2022. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Letter: Review of Cerebrospinal Fluid Physiology and Dynamics: A Call for Medical Education Reform.Neurosurgery. 2022 Nov 1;91(5):e148-e149. doi: 10.1227/neu.0000000000002159. Epub 2022 Sep 15. Neurosurgery. 2022. PMID: 36106885 No abstract available.
-
In Reply: Review of Cerebrospinal Fluid Physiology and Dynamics: A Call for Medical Education Reform.Neurosurgery. 2022 Nov 1;91(5):e150. doi: 10.1227/neu.0000000000002160. Epub 2022 Sep 15. Neurosurgery. 2022. PMID: 36106897 No abstract available.
References
-
- Dandy WE. Experimental hydrocephalus. Ann Surg. 1919;70(2):129-142.
-
- Weed LH. Meninges and cerebrospinal fluid. J Anat. 1938;72(pt 2):181-215.
-
- Weed LH. Studies on cerebro-spinal fluid. No. II: the theories of drainage of cerebro-spinal fluid with an analysis of the methods of investigation. J Med Res. 1914;31(1):21-49.
-
- Weed LH. Studies on cerebro-spinal fluid. No. III: the pathways of escape from the subarachnoid spaces with particular reference to the arachnoid villi. J Med Res. 1914;31(1):51-91.
-
- Bulat M, Klarica M. Recent insights into a new hydrodynamics of the cerebrospinal fluid. Brain Res Rev. 2011;65(2):99-112.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous
