Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 May 26;185(11):1875-1887.e8.
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2022.04.009. Epub 2022 Apr 8.

Efficient recall of Omicron-reactive B cell memory after a third dose of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine

Affiliations

Efficient recall of Omicron-reactive B cell memory after a third dose of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine

Rishi R Goel et al. Cell. .

Abstract

We examined antibody and memory B cell responses longitudinally for ∼9-10 months after primary 2-dose SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination and 3 months after a 3rd dose. Antibody decay stabilized between 6 and 9 months, and antibody quality continued to improve for at least 9 months after 2-dose vaccination. Spike- and RBD-specific memory B cells remained durable over time, and 40%-50% of RBD-specific memory B cells simultaneously bound the Alpha, Beta, Delta, and Omicron variants. Omicron-binding memory B cells were efficiently reactivated by a 3rd dose of wild-type vaccine and correlated with the corresponding increase in neutralizing antibody titers. In contrast, pre-3rd dose antibody titers inversely correlated with the fold-change of antibody boosting, suggesting that high levels of circulating antibodies may limit the added protection afforded by repeat short interval boosting. These data provide insight into the quantity and quality of mRNA-vaccine-induced immunity over time through 3 or more antigen exposures.

Keywords: COVID-19; Omicron; SARS-CoV-2; antibody; booster; immune memory; mRNA; memory B cell; vaccine; variants of concern.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of interests S.E.H. has received consultancy fees from Sanofi Pasteur, Lumen, Novavax, and Merck for work unrelated to this study. A.R.G. is a consultant for Relation Therapeutics. E.J.W. is consulting for or is an advisor for Merck, Marengo, Janssen, Related Sciences, Synthekine, and Surface Oncology. E.J.W. is a founder of Surface Oncology, Danger Bio, and Arsenal Biosciences.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Antibody responses after 2 and 3 doses of mRNA vaccine.
A) Study design and cohort characteristics. B) anti-Spike and C) anti-RBD IgG concentrations over time in plasma samples from vaccinated individuals. D) Pseudovirus (PSV) neutralization titers against wild-type D614G Spike protein over time in plasma samples from vaccinated individuals. Data are represented as focus reduction neutralization titer 50% (FRNT50) values. E) Antibody neutralization potency against D614G over time. Potency was calculated as neutralizing titer (FRNT50) divided by the paired concentration of anti-RBD IgG. F and G) Plasma neutralizing activity against D614G and Omicron before and after booster vaccination. Dotted lines indicate limit of detection for the assay. Green boxes and lines indicate interquartile range (IQR) and median of D614G neutralizing titers ~1 week following the second vaccine dose in SARS-CoV-2 naïve subjects. H and I) Comparison of antibody potency against D614G, Delta, and Omicron between SARS-CoV-2 naïve and previously infected vaccinees. For I, bars indicate mean with 95% confidence intervals. Statistics were calculated using unpaired non-parametric Wilcoxon test with Benjamini-Hochberg correction for multiple comparisons. Breakthrough infection samples were excluded from statistical comparisons. Median fold changes for selected comparisons are indicated. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; ****P < 0.0001; ns, not significant. Binding antibody and D614G pseudovirus neutralization data from pre-vaccine baseline through six months post-primary vaccination were described previously (Goel et al., 2021a).
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Memory B cell responses after 2 and 3 doses of mRNA vaccine.
A) Flow cytometry gating strategy for SARS-CoV-2-specific plasmablasts. B) Frequency of Spike+ plasmablasts ~1 week after booster vaccination or post-vaccine breakthrough infection. Data are represented as a percentage of total B cells. C) Flow cytometry gating strategy for SARS-CoV-2-specific memory B cells. D) Frequency of Spike+ and E) Spike+ RBD+ memory B cells over time in PBMCs from vaccinated individuals. Data are represented as a percentage of total B cells. F) Fold change in the frequency of Spike+ and G) Spike+ RBD+ memory B cells after booster vaccination relative to paired pre-boost samples. Median fold change is indicated in dashed blue or red lines. Dashed black lines at fold change = 1 indicate no change in frequency compared to pre-boost samples. H) Isotype composition of Spike+ memory B cells in vaccinated individuals pre- and post-boost. I) Activation status of Spike+ memory B cells over time in vaccinated individuals following booster vaccination. Statistics were calculated using unpaired non-parametric Wilcoxon test. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; ****P < 0.0001; ns, not significant. See also Figure S1. Memory B cell responses from pre-vaccine baseline through six months post-primary vaccination were re-analyzed from a previous dataset (Goel et al., 2021a).
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. Variant-reactive memory B cell responses after 2 and 3 doses of mRNA vaccine.
A) Experimental design and B) flow cytometry gating strategy for SARS-CoV-2 variant-reactive memory B cells. C) Frequency of NTD+, WT RBD+, All Variant RBD+, and S2+ memory B cells in vaccinated individuals pre- and post-boost. D) Fold change in the frequency of antigen-specific memory B cells after booster vaccination relative to paired pre-boost samples. Median fold change for each variable is indicated in dashed blue or red lines. Dashed black lines at fold change = 1 indicate no change in frequency compared to pre-boost samples. E) Variant cross-binding of RBD-specific memory B cells in vaccinated individuals. Data are represented as a percentage of WT RBD+ cells. F) Boolean analysis of variant cross-binding memory B cell populations in vaccinated individuals ~2 weeks after 3rd vaccination or at a cross-sectional timepoint in individuals with a post-vaccine breakthrough infection. Pie charts indicate the fraction of WT RBD+ memory B cells that cross-bind zero, one, two, three, or four variant RBDs. Colored arcs indicate cross-binding to specific variants. G) Comparison of RBD variant cross-binding between SARS-CoV-2 naïve and previously infected vaccinees before and ~2 weeks after 3rd vaccination. For G, bars indicate mean with 95% confidence intervals. Statistics were calculated using unpaired non-parametric Wilcoxon test with Benjamini-Hochberg correction for multiple comparisons. Breakthrough infection samples were excluded from statistical comparisons. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; ****P < 0.0001; ns, not significant. See also Figure S2.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.. Activation of Omicron-reactive B cell memory after a 3rd dose of mRNA vaccine.
A) Heatmap and hierarchal clustering of memory B cell activation status by antigen specificity at pre- and post-3rd dose timepoints. Prior COVID infection and/or post-vaccine breakthrough infection are indicated. B) Median fold change in the frequency of Omicron RBD-binding versus non-binding memory B cells after booster vaccination relative to paired pre-boost samples. Dashed black lines at fold change = 1 indicate no change in frequency compared to pre-boost samples. C) Representative flow cytometry plots for activation phenotype of Omicron RBD-binding versus Omicron RBD non-binding (but still wild-type RBD binding) memory B cells. D) Frequency of activated memory (AM), resting memory (RM), or double negative (DN) subsets in Omicron RBD-binding versus non-binding memory B cells before and ~2 weeks after a 3rd vaccination. For B-D, analysis was restricted to SARS-CoV-2 naïve vaccinees. Statistics were calculated using paired non-parametric Wilcoxon test with Benjamini-Hochberg correction for multiple comparisons. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; ****P < 0.0001; ns, not significant. See also Figure S2.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.. Immune relationships after 2 and 3 doses of mRNA vaccine.
(A) UMAP of antibody and memory B cell responses to mRNA vaccination. Data points represent individual participants and are colored by timepoint relative to primary vaccine. B) UMAP coordinates of SARS-CoV-2–naïve and –recovered subjects over time. Labels indicate centroids for each group at the indicated timepoint. Breakthrough infection samples were excluded from calculations of group centroids. C) Correlation matrix of antibody and memory B cell responses over time in SARS-CoV-2–naïve subjects. D) Correlation of pre-boost RBD+ memory B cell frequencies with neutralizing antibody recall responses to D614G and Omicron. Recall responses were calculated as the difference between pre- and post-boost titers ~2 weeks after the 3rd vaccine dose. E) Change in binding and neutralizing antibody responses after a 3rd vaccine dose in individuals with 3 versus 4 exposures to SARS-CoV-2 antigen, calculated as in D. Dotted lines indicate no change in antibodies. F) Correlation of pre-boost binding antibody responses with change in antibody responses after boost, calculated as in D. G) Peak binding and neutralizing antibody responses after 3 versus 4 exposures to SARS-CoV-2 antigen (~2 weeks post 3rd dose in SARS-CoV-2 naïve and SARS-CoV-2 recovered individuals). Dotted lines indicate the limit of detection for the assay. H) Correlation of pre-boost binding antibody responses with peak post-boost antibody responses. I) Fold change in antibody responses after 3 versus 4 exposures to SARS-CoV-2 antigen. Dotted lines indicate no change in antibodies. J) Correlation of fold-change in antibody responses after boosting with pre-3rd dose antibody levels. Statistics were calculated using unpaired non-parametric Wilcoxon test with Benjamini-Hochberg correction for multiple comparisons. All correlations were calculated using nonparametric Spearman rank correlation. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; ****P < 0.0001; ns, not significant. See also Figure S3.

Update of

References

    1. Bournazos S, and Ravetch J. v. (2017). Fcγ Receptor Function and the Design of Vaccination Strategies. Immunity 47, 224–233. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cameroni E, Bowen JE, Rosen LE, Saliba C, Zepeda SK, Culap K, Pinto D, VanBlargan LA, de Marco A, di Iulio J, et al. (2021). Broadly neutralizing antibodies overcome SARS-CoV-2 Omicron antigenic shift. Nature 2021 1–9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Carvalho T, Krammer F, and Iwasaki A (2021). The first 12 months of COVID-19: a timeline of immunological insights. Nature Reviews Immunology 1–12. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cele S, Jackson L, Khoury DS, Khan K, Moyo-Gwete T, Tegally H, San JE, Cromer D, Scheepers C, Amoako DG, et al. (2021). Omicron extensively but incompletely escapes Pfizer BNT162b2 neutralization. Nature 2021 1–5. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chatterjee D, Tauzin A, Marchitto L, Gong SY, Boutin M, Bourassa C, Beaudoin-Bussières G, Bo Y, Ding S, Laumaea A, et al. (2022). SARS-CoV-2 Omicron Spike recognition by plasma from individuals receiving BNT162b2 mRNA vaccination with a 16-weeks interval between doses. Cell Reports 0, 110429. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Supplementary concepts