Outpatient versus inpatient lumbar decompression surgery: a matched noninferiority study investigating clinical and patient-reported outcomes
- PMID: 35523251
- DOI: 10.3171/2022.3.SPINE211558
Outpatient versus inpatient lumbar decompression surgery: a matched noninferiority study investigating clinical and patient-reported outcomes
Abstract
Objective: Spine surgery represents an ideal target for healthcare cost reduction efforts, with outpatient surgery resulting in significant cost savings. With an increased focus on value-based healthcare delivery, lumbar decompression surgery has been increasingly performed in the outpatient setting when appropriate. The aim of this study was to compare clinical and patient-reported outcomes following outpatient and inpatient lumbar decompression surgery.
Methods: The Quality Outcomes Database (QOD) was queried for patients undergoing elective one- or two-level lumbar decompression (laminectomy or laminotomy with or without discectomy) for degenerative spine disease. Patients were grouped as outpatient if they had a length of stay (LOS) < 24 hours and as inpatient if they stayed in the hospital ≥ 24 hours. Patients with ≥ 72-hour stay were excluded from the comparative analysis to increase baseline comparability between the two groups. To create two highly homogeneous groups, optimal matching was performed at a 1:1 ratio between the two groups on 38 baseline variables, including demographics, comorbidities, symptoms, patient-reported scores, indications, and operative details. Outcomes of interest were readmissions and reoperations at 30 days and 3 months after surgery, overall satisfaction, and decrease in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), back pain, and leg pain at 3 months after surgery. Satisfaction was defined as a score of 1 or 2 in the North American Spine Society patient satisfaction index. Noninferiority of outpatient compared with inpatient surgery was defined as risk difference of < 1.5% at a one-sided 97.5% confidence interval.
Results: A total of 18,689 eligible one- and two-level decompression surgeries were identified. The matched study cohorts consisted of 5016 patients in each group. Nonroutine discharge was slightly less common in the outpatient group (0.6% vs 0.3%, p = 0.01). The 30-day readmission rates were 4.4% and 4.3% for the outpatient and inpatient groups, respectively, while the 30-day reoperation rates were 1.4% and 1.5%. The 3-month readmission rates were 6.3% for both groups, and the 3-month reoperation rates were 3.1% for the outpatient cases and 2.9% for the inpatient cases. Overall satisfaction at 3 months was 88.8% for the outpatient group and 88.4% for the inpatient group. Noninferiority of outpatient surgery was documented for readmissions, reoperations, and patient-reported satisfaction from surgery.
Conclusions: Outpatient lumbar decompression surgery demonstrated slightly lower nonroutine discharge rates in comparison with inpatient surgery. Noninferiority in clinical outcomes at 30 days and 3 months after surgery was documented for outpatient compared with inpatient decompression surgery. Additionally, outpatient decompression surgery performed noninferiorly to inpatient surgery in achieving patient satisfaction from surgery.
Keywords: Quality Outcomes Database; lumbar decompression; noninferiority analysis; outpatient surgery; patient-reported outcomes; readmissions; reoperations.
Similar articles
-
Minimally invasive versus open lumbar spinal fusion: a matched study investigating patient-reported and surgical outcomes.J Neurosurg Spine. 2021 Dec 14;36(5):753-766. doi: 10.3171/2021.10.SPINE211128. Print 2022 May 1. J Neurosurg Spine. 2021. PMID: 34905727
-
Does diabetes affect outcome or reoperation rate after lumbar decompression or arthrodesis? A matched analysis of the Quality Outcomes Database data set.J Neurosurg Spine. 2023 Dec 1;40(3):331-342. doi: 10.3171/2023.9.SPINE23522. Print 2024 Mar 1. J Neurosurg Spine. 2023. PMID: 38039534
-
Minimally invasive versus open fusion for Grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: analysis of the Quality Outcomes Database.Neurosurg Focus. 2017 Aug;43(2):E11. doi: 10.3171/2017.5.FOCUS17188. Neurosurg Focus. 2017. PMID: 28760035
-
Does patient selection account for the perceived cost savings in outpatient spine surgery? A meta-analysis of current evidence and analysis from an administrative database.J Neurosurg Spine. 2018 Dec 1;29(6):687-695. doi: 10.3171/2018.4.SPINE1864. Epub 2018 Sep 14. J Neurosurg Spine. 2018. PMID: 30215589 Review.
-
Safety and feasibility of same-day discharge following lumbar decompression surgery: A systematic review.Brain Spine. 2022 Apr 18;2:100888. doi: 10.1016/j.bas.2022.100888. eCollection 2022. Brain Spine. 2022. PMID: 36248095 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Durotomy During Outpatient Lumbar Discectomy Should Not Preclude Same-Day Discharge: A Case Series.Neurosurg Pract. 2024 Sep 10;5(4):e00112. doi: 10.1227/neuprac.0000000000000112. eCollection 2024 Dec. Neurosurg Pract. 2024. PMID: 39959537 Free PMC article.
-
National Trends in Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis With Stenosis Treated With Fusion Versus Decompression.Neurospine. 2024 Dec;21(4):1068-1077. doi: 10.14245/ns.2448624.312. Epub 2024 Dec 31. Neurospine. 2024. PMID: 39765242 Free PMC article.
-
Patterns in Decompression and Fusion Procedures for Patients With Lumbar Stenosis After Major Clinical Trial Results, 2016 to 2019.JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Jul 3;6(7):e2326357. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.26357. JAMA Netw Open. 2023. PMID: 37523184 Free PMC article.
-
Database analysis comparing incidence and complication rates between inpatient and outpatient laminotomies for lumbar disc herniation.N Am Spine Soc J. 2024 May 7;18:100328. doi: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2024.100328. eCollection 2024 Jun. N Am Spine Soc J. 2024. PMID: 38966040 Free PMC article.
-
Biportal Endoscopic Approach for Lumbar Degenerative Disease in the Ambulatory Outpatient vs Inpatient Setting: A Comparative Study.Int J Spine Surg. 2023 Dec 26;17(6):858-865. doi: 10.14444/8545. Int J Spine Surg. 2023. PMID: 37770193 Free PMC article.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources