Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 May;9(1):e000901.
doi: 10.1136/bmjgast-2022-000901.

ARFI elastography of the omentum: feasibility and diagnostic performance in differentiating benign from malignant omental masses

Affiliations

ARFI elastography of the omentum: feasibility and diagnostic performance in differentiating benign from malignant omental masses

Amjad Alhyari et al. BMJ Open Gastroenterol. 2022 May.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the feasibility and diagnostic performance of acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) elastography in different omental masses (OM).

Design: This was a retrospective analysis of 106 patients with OM defined as omental thickness ≥1 cm, who underwent abdominal B-mode ultrasound (US) and standardised ARFI examinations of the OM between September 2018 and June 2021 at our university hospital. A cytohistological confirmation was available in 91/106 (85.8%) of all OM, including all 65/65 (100%) malignant OM (mOM) and 26/41 (63.4%) of benign OM (bOM). In 15/41 (36.6%) of bOM; cross-sectional imaging and or US follow-up with a mean duration of 19.8±3.1 months was performed. To examine the mean ARFI velocities (MAV) for potential cut-off values between bOM and mOM a receiver operating characteristic analysis was implemented.

Results: The MAV in the mOM group (2.71±1.04 m/s) was significantly higher than that of bOM group (1.27±0.87 m/s) (p<0.001). Using 1.97 m/s as a cut-off yielded a sensitivity and specificity of 76.9% and 85.4%, respectively, in diagnosing mOM (area under the curve=0.851, 95% CI=0.774 to 0.928).

Conclusion: ARFI elastography is feasible in the omentum and may represent a good non-invasive additional tool in differentiating bOM from mOM.

Keywords: GASTROINTESTINAL ULTRASOUND; IMAGING; RADIOLOGY; SURGICAL ONCOLOGY; TUMOUR MARKERS.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram of the study patients. ARFI, acoustic radiation force impulse.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Benign omental mass. A 41-year-old male patient with unexplained ascites; (A) CT scan showing ascites and thickened omentum (courtesy of Professor Dr Mahnken, Department of Radiology, University Hospital Marburg), (B) US elastography image showing a mass-like echogenic omentum in the epigastric area with one ARFI measurement of 0.55 m/s, (C) the final ARFI report of the same mass sowing a mean ARFI velocity (MW) of 0.58 m/s. After surgical exploration, the diagnosis of bacterial peritonitis as a delayed presentation of a perforated subacute appendicitis was established and histologically confirmed.ARFI, acoustic radiation force impulse; US, ultrasound.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Malignant omental mass. A 51-year-old male patient with unexplained ascites; (A) CT scan showing ascites and inhomogeneous omental mass with multiple nodules (omental caking) (courtesy of Professor Dr Mahnken, Department of Radiology, University Hospital Marburg), (B) US elastography image showing an inhomogeneous multinodular OM in the left lower quadrant with one ARFI measurement of 2.51 m/s, (C) the final ARFI report of the same mass sowing a mean ARFI velocity (MW) of 2.54 m/s. The final histology of the US-guided omental biopsy as well as that of the surgical specimens was diffuse omental and peritoneal metastases from an appendiceal carcinoma. ARFI, acoustic radiation force impulse; OM, omental masses; US, ultrasound.
Figure 4
Figure 4
(A) Differences of mean ARFI velocities between benign and malignant omental masses (mOM) in the study. The mean ARFI velocity (MAV) in m/s is represented with an ‘X’ in each box, and the median ARFI velocity of each group is shown as a horizontal line within each box. (B) Receiver operator characteristic curve for the differences in mean ARFI velocities between benign and malignant omental masses. ARFI, acoustic radiation force impulse; bOM, benign OM.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Yoo E, Kim JH, Kim M-J, et al. . Greater and lesser omenta: normal anatomy and pathologic processes. Radiographics 2007;27:707–20. 10.1148/rg.273065085 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Healy JC, Reznek RH. The peritoneum, mesenteries and omenta: normal anatomy and pathological processes. Eur Radiol 1998;8:886–900. 10.1007/s003300050485 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Di Nicola V. Omentum a powerful biological source in regenerative surgery. Regen Ther 2019;11:182–91. 10.1016/j.reth.2019.07.008 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. HS G. The omentum. Springer Science & Business Media, 2012.
    1. Zhang Y, Wang X, Tao C, et al. . Ultrasound elastography for differentiating benign from malignant thickened greater omentum. Eur Radiol 2016;26:2337–43. 10.1007/s00330-015-4037-0 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources