Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Sep;9(3):366-385.
doi: 10.1007/s40572-022-00355-7. Epub 2022 May 7.

Wildfire, Smoke Exposure, Human Health, and Environmental Justice Need to be Integrated into Forest Restoration and Management

Affiliations
Review

Wildfire, Smoke Exposure, Human Health, and Environmental Justice Need to be Integrated into Forest Restoration and Management

Savannah M D'Evelyn et al. Curr Environ Health Rep. 2022 Sep.

Abstract

Purpose of review: Increasing wildfire size and severity across the western United States has created an environmental and social crisis that must be approached from a transdisciplinary perspective. Climate change and more than a century of fire exclusion and wildfire suppression have led to contemporary wildfires with more severe environmental impacts and human smoke exposure. Wildfires increase smoke exposure for broad swaths of the US population, though outdoor workers and socially disadvantaged groups with limited adaptive capacity can be disproportionally exposed. Exposure to wildfire smoke is associated with a range of health impacts in children and adults, including exacerbation of existing respiratory diseases such as asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, worse birth outcomes, and cardiovascular events. Seasonally dry forests in Washington, Oregon, and California can benefit from ecological restoration as a way to adapt forests to climate change and reduce smoke impacts on affected communities.

Recent findings: Each wildfire season, large smoke events, and their adverse impacts on human health receive considerable attention from both the public and policymakers. The severity of recent wildfire seasons has state and federal governments outlining budgets and prioritizing policies to combat the worsening crisis. This surging attention provides an opportunity to outline the actions needed now to advance research and practice on conservation, economic, environmental justice, and public health interests, as well as the trade-offs that must be considered. Scientists, planners, foresters and fire managers, fire safety, air quality, and public health practitioners must collaboratively work together. This article is the result of a series of transdisciplinary conversations to find common ground and subsequently provide a holistic view of how forest and fire management intersect with human health through the impacts of smoke and articulate the need for an integrated approach to both planning and practice.

Keywords: Air quality; Collaborative partnerships; Ecological restoration; Environmental justice; Exposure; Interdisciplinary; Prescribed burning; Public health; Smoke; Wildland fire.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Historical weather and wildland vegetation in the western US in May-October. A Time series of the annual mean fire weather index and B the annual maximum temperatures from 1980 to 2019 within seasonally dry coniferous forests. The fire weather index is a measure of potential fire intensity based on temperature, relative humidity, wind speed, and 24-h precipitation. Only the wildfire season from May through October was plotted. C Fire regime map based on vegetation cover and natural fire regimes in 2019. Data downloaded from climatologylab.org/gridmet for weather data and landfire.gov/ for fire regime and vegetation cover data. Methodology described in Supplemental Text 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Populations vulnerable to the health risks of smoke exposure. The Community Health Vulnerability Index (CHVI) is designed to capture community vulnerability to wildfire smoke based on factors known to increase the risk of health effects from airborne pollutants (15 parameters described in Supplemental Text 1). Percentiles by county are adapted from Rappold et al. [40]. Higher percentiles indicate more vulnerable areas

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Moritz MA, Parisien M-A, Batllori E, Krawchuk MA, Van Dorn J, Ganz DJ, et al. Climate change and disruptions to global fire activity. Ecosphere [Internet]. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2012;3:art49. Available from: 10.1890/ES11-00345.1
    1. North MP, Stephens SL, Collins BM, Agee JK, Aplet G, Franklin JF, et al. Reform forest fire management. Science (80- ) [Internet]. 2015;349:1280 LP – 1281. Available from: http://science.sciencemag.org/content/349/6254/1280.abstract - PubMed
    1. Parks SA, Abatzoglou JT. Warmer and drier fire seasons contribute to increases in area burned at high severity in western US forests from 1985 to 2017. Geophys Res Lett [Internet]. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2020;47:e2020GL089858. Available from: 10.1029/2020GL089858
    1. Westerling AL. Wildfire simulations for California’s fourth climate change assessment: projecting changes in extreme wildfire events with a warming climate [Internet] 2018.
    1. Abatzoglou JT, Williams AP. Impact of anthropogenic climate change on wildfire across western US forests. Proc Natl Acad Sci [Internet]. 2016;113:11770 LP – 11775. Available from: http://www.pnas.org/content/113/42/11770.abstract - PMC - PubMed

Publication types