Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 May 1;51(5):afac075.
doi: 10.1093/ageing/afac075.

Frailty indices based on self-report, blood-based biomarkers and examination-based data in the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging

Affiliations

Frailty indices based on self-report, blood-based biomarkers and examination-based data in the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging

Joanna M Blodgett et al. Age Ageing. .

Abstract

Background: Frailty can be operationalised using the deficit accumulation approach, which considers health deficits across multiple domains. We aimed to develop, validate and compare three different frailty indices (FI) constructed from self-reported health measures (FI-Self Report), blood-based biomarkers (FI-Blood) and examination-based assessments (FI-Examination).

Methods: Up to 30,027 participants aged 45-85 years from the baseline (2011-2015) comprehensive cohort of the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging were included in the analyses. Following standard criteria, three FIs were created: a 48-item FI-Self Report, a 23-item FI-Blood and a 47-item FI-Examination. In addition a 118-item FI-Combined was constructed. Mortality status was ascertained in July 2019.

Results: FI-Blood and FI-Examination demonstrated broader distributions than FI-Self Report. FI-Self Report and FI-Blood scores were higher in females, whereas FI-Examination scores were higher in males. All FI scores increased nonlinearly with age and were highest at lower education levels. In sex and age-adjusted models, a 0.01 increase in FI score was associated with a 1.08 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.07,1.10], 1.05 (1.04,1.06), 1.07 (1.05,1.08) and a 1.13 (1.11,1.16) increased odds of mortality for FI-Self Report, FI-Blood, FI-Examination and FI-Combined, respectively. Inclusion of the three distinct FI types in a single model yielded the best prognostic accuracy and model fit, even compared to the FI-Combined, with all FIs remaining independently associated with mortality.

Conclusion: Characteristics of all FIs were largely consistent with previously established FIs. To adequately capture frailty levels and to improve our understanding of the heterogeneity of ageing, FIs should consider multiple types of deficits including self-reported, blood and examination-based measures.

Keywords: Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (CLSA); Frailty; ageing; epidemiology; older people.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Distribution of (A) FI-Self Report; (B) FI-Blood; (C) FI-Examination and (D) FI-Combined.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Age association by sex of the (A) FI-Self Report; (B) FI-Blood; (C) FI-Examination and (D) FI-Combined.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Rockwood K, Howlett SE. Age-related deficit accumulation and the diseases of ageing. Mech Ageing Dev 2019; 180: 107–16. - PubMed
    1. Rockwood K, Song X, MacKnight Cet al. . A global clinical measure of fitness and frailty in elderly people. CMAJ 2005; 173: 489–95. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Searle SD, Mitnitski A, Gahbauer EA, Gill TM, Rockwood K. A standard procedure for creating a frailty index. BMC Geriatr 2008; 8: 24. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mitnitski AB, Mogilner AJ, Rockwood K. Accumulation of deficits as a proxy measure of aging. Sci World J 2001; 1: 323–36. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rockwood K, Mitnitski A. Frailty, fitness, and the mathematics of deficit accumulation. Rev Clin Gerontol 2007; 17: 1–12.

Publication types

Grants and funding