Values and preferences for contraception: A global systematic review
- PMID: 35525287
- PMCID: PMC9232836
- DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2022.04.011
Values and preferences for contraception: A global systematic review
Abstract
Objective: To identify and synthesize original research on contraceptive user values, preferences, views, and concerns about specific family planning methods, as well as perspectives from health workers.
Study design: We conducted a systematic review of global contraceptive user values and preferences. We searched 10 electronic databases for qualitative and quantitative studies published from 2005 to 2020 and extracted data in duplicate using standard forms.
Results: Overall, 423 original research articles from 93 countries among various groups of end-users and health workers in all 6 World Health Organization regions and all 4 World Bank income classification categories met inclusion criteria. Of these, 250 (59%) articles were from high-income countries, mostly from the United States of America (n = 139), the United Kingdom (n = 29), and Australia (n = 23). Quantitative methods were used in 269 articles, most often cross-sectional surveys (n = 190). Qualitative interviews were used in 116 articles and focus group discussions in 69 articles. The most commonly reported themes included side effects, effectiveness, and ease/frequency/duration of use. Interference in sex and partner relations, menstrual effects, reversibility, counseling/interactions with health workers, cost/availability, autonomy, and discreet use were also important. Users generally reported satisfaction with (and more accurate knowledge about) the methods they were using.
Conclusions: Contraceptive users have diverse values and preferences, although there is consistency in core themes across settings. Despite the large body of literature identified and relevance to person-centered care, varied reporting of findings limited robust synthesis and quantification of the review results.
Keywords: Contraception; Health worker preferences; Patient preferences; Systematic review.
Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Health workers' values and preferences regarding contraceptive methods globally: A systematic review.Contraception. 2022 Jul;111:61-70. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2022.04.012. Epub 2022 May 5. Contraception. 2022. PMID: 35526598 Free PMC article.
-
Client Preferences for Contraceptive Counseling: A Systematic Review.Am J Prev Med. 2018 Nov;55(5):691-702. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.06.006. Am J Prev Med. 2018. PMID: 30342632 Free PMC article.
-
Women in larger bodies' experiences with contraception: a scoping review.Reprod Health. 2021 Apr 29;18(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s12978-021-01139-2. Reprod Health. 2021. PMID: 33926501 Free PMC article.
-
Contraceptive values and preferences of adolescents and young adults: A systematic review.Contraception. 2022 Jul;111:22-31. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2021.05.018. Epub 2021 May 30. Contraception. 2022. PMID: 34077748
-
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881. Med J Aust. 2020. PMID: 33314144
Cited by
-
Measuring contraceptive self-efficacy in women: the Turkish validity and reliability study.Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2025 May 6;26:e36. doi: 10.1017/S146342362500026X. Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2025. PMID: 40325868 Free PMC article.
-
Systematic review of the values and preferences regarding the use of injectable pre-exposure prophylaxis to prevent HIV acquisition.J Int AIDS Soc. 2023 Jul;26 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):e26107. doi: 10.1002/jia2.26107. J Int AIDS Soc. 2023. PMID: 37439057 Free PMC article.
-
"I will find the best method that will work for me": navigating contraceptive journeys amongst South African adolescent girls and young women.Contracept Reprod Med. 2024 Aug 2;9(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s40834-024-00298-4. Contracept Reprod Med. 2024. PMID: 39090752 Free PMC article.
-
Patient Perceived Quality of Virtual Group Contraception Counseling.Open Access J Contracept. 2024 Jul 4;15:99-105. doi: 10.2147/OAJC.S467537. eCollection 2024. Open Access J Contracept. 2024. PMID: 38978762 Free PMC article.
-
Exploring Adolescents' Contraceptive Preferences and Trade-Offs: Findings From a Discrete Choice Experiment in Kenya.Stud Fam Plann. 2025 Mar;56(1):41-64. doi: 10.1111/sifp.12280. Epub 2025 Jan 8. Stud Fam Plann. 2025. PMID: 39780241
References
-
- WHO . 5th ed. World Health Organization; Geneva, Switzerland: 2015. Medical eligibility criteria for contraceptive use.https://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/family_planning/MEC-... Available at. - PubMed
-
- WHO . 3rd ed. World Health Organization; Geneva, Switzerland: 2016. Selected practice recommendations for contraceptive use.https://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/family_planning/SPR-... Available at. - PubMed
-
- WHO . 2nd ed. World Health Organization; Geneva, Switzerland: 2014. WHO handbook for guideline development.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous