Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2022 May 7;30(1):33.
doi: 10.1186/s13049-022-01018-0.

Helicopter inter-hospital transfer for patients undergoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a retrospective 12-year analysis of a service system

Affiliations
Observational Study

Helicopter inter-hospital transfer for patients undergoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a retrospective 12-year analysis of a service system

Alexander Fuchs et al. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. .

Abstract

Background: Patients undergoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) are critically ill and show high mortality. Inter-hospital transfer of these patients has to be safe, with high survival rates during transport without potentially serious and life-threatening adverse events. The Swiss Air-Rescue provides 24-h/7-days per week inter-hospital helicopter transfers that include on-site ECMO cannulation if needed. This retrospective observational study describes adverse events of patients on ECMO transported by helicopter, and their associated survival.

Methods: All patients on ECMO with inter-hospital transfer by helicopter from start of service in February 2009 until May 2021 were included. Patients not transported by helicopter or with missing medical records were excluded. Patient demographics (age, sex) and medical history (type of and reason for ECMO), mission details (flight distance, times, primary or secondary transport), adverse events during the inter-hospital transfer, and survival of transferred patients were recorded. The primary endpoint was patient survival during transfer. Secondary endpoints were adverse events during transfer and 28-day survival.

Results: We screened 214 ECMO-related missions and included 191 in this analysis. Median age was 54.6 [IQR 46.1-62.0] years, 70.7% were male, and most patients had veno-arterial ECMO (56.5%). The main reasons for ECMO were pulmonary (46.1%) or cardiac (44.0%) failure. Most were daytime (69.8%) and primary missions (n = 100), median total mission time was 182.0 [143.0-254.0] min, and median transfer distance was 52.7 [33.2-71.1] km. All patients survived the transfer. Forty-four adverse events were recorded during 37 missions (19.4%), where 31 (70.5%) were medical and none resulted in patient harm. Adverse events occurred more frequently during night-time missions (59.9%, p = 0.047). Data for 28-day survival were available for 157 patients, of which 86 (54.8%) were alive.

Conclusion: All patients under ECMO survived the helicopter transport. Adverse events were observed for about 20% of the flight missions, with a tendency during the night-time flights, none harmed the patients. Inter-hospital transfer for patients undergoing ECMO provided by 24-h/7-d per week helicopter emergency medical service teams can be considered as feasible and safe. The majority of the patients (54.8%) were still alive after 28 days.

Keywords: Adverse events; Air-medical transport; Extracorporeal life support; Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; Helicopter emergency medical system; Inter-hospital transfer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

RG is the ERC Board Director of International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) and Guidelines, and ILCOR Education, Implementation and Team Task Force Chair. All of the other authors declare that they have no conflicts of interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study flow chart
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
All of the missions carried out by helicopter with a patient under extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Arrows, colour-coded according the main diagnosis, starting on the map [18] with black dot for referral hospital, pointing towards destination tertiary hospital. Main destination hospitals: B, Bern (Switzerland); F, Freiburg (Germany); G, Geneva (Switzerland); L, Lausanne (Switzerland); S, St. Gallen (Switzerland); T, Tuebingen (Germany); Z, Zurich (Switzerland)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Odds ratios for adverse events shown with regression coefficients (blue circle) and corresponding 95% confidence limits (lines). The variables daytime, veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and male sex are reference groups
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Odds ratios for 28-day survival shown with regression coefficients (blue circle) and corresponding 95% confidence limits (lines). The variables daytime, veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and male sex are reference groups

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Xiong J, Zhang L, Bao L. Complications and mortality of venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in the treatment of neonatal respiratory failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pulm Med. 2020;20:124. doi: 10.1186/s12890-020-1144-8. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zangrillo A, Landoni G, Biondi-Zoccai G, et al. A meta-analysis of complications and mortality of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Crit Care Resusc. 2013;15:172–178. - PubMed
    1. Biancari F, Perrotti A, Dalen M, et al. Meta-Analysis of the Outcome After Postcardiotomy Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Adult Patients. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2018;32:1175–1182. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2017.08.048. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO). ECMO Registry of the ELSO, 2021. https://www.elso.org/Registry/InternationalSummaryandReports/Internation... (accessed 2022–02–23).
    1. Soar J, Bottiger BW, Carli P, et al. European Resuscitation Council Guidelines 2021: Adult advanced life support. Resuscitation. 2021;161:115–151. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.02.010. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types