Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jul-Aug:101:104713.
doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2022.104713. Epub 2022 Apr 30.

Validation and comparison of fall screening tools for predicting future falls among older adults

Affiliations

Validation and comparison of fall screening tools for predicting future falls among older adults

Elizabeth R Burns et al. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2022 Jul-Aug.

Abstract

Background: Falls are the leading cause of injuries among older adults in the United States (US). Falls are preventable and clinicians are advised to screen for fall risk yearly. There are many falls screening tools and not all have been validated for their ability to predict future falls.

Methods: We enrolled 1905 community-dwelling older adults into a 13-month study using a probability-based representative panel of the US population recruited from NORC at the University of Chicago's National Frame. Respondents completed a baseline survey, 11 monthly fall calendars, and a final survey. The baseline survey included six falls screening tools (the Stay Independent, Three Key Questions (3KQ), a modified American Geriatric/British Geriatric tool, the short Falls Efficacy-1[FES-I]) and two single screening questions ("I have fallen in the past year" and "How many times did you fall in the past 12 months?"). The baseline and final survey collected demographic and health information, including falls. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios, and corresponding 95% confidence intervals were calculated in SAS using weighted proportions.

Results: There were 1563 respondents who completed the final survey (completion rate 82%). Sensitivity estimates ranged from 22.5% for the short FES-I to 68.7% for the 3KQ. Specificity estimates ranged from 57.9% for the 3KQ to 89.4% for the short FES-I.

Conclusions: Falls screening tools have varying sensitivity and specificity for predicting the occurrence of a fall in the following 12 months.

Keywords: Accidental falls; Older adults; Screen; Sensitivity and specificity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Competing Interest

None of the authors have relevant financial interests, activities, relationships, or affiliations, or other potential conflicts of interest to report.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Baseline percentage1 of older adults at increased risk for a future fall, by screening question or tool2 1Percentage is unweighted and is comprised of the 1563 respondents who completed the final survey. 2Cut-off values for screening at increased risk for future fall are described in Table 1.

References

    1. Ambrose AF, Paul G, & Hausdorff JM (2013). Risk factors for falls among older adults: A review of the literature. Maturitas, 75(1), 51–61. - PubMed
    1. American Geriatrics Society. (2001). British geriatrics society, and american academy of orthopaedic surgeons panel on falls prevention. Guideline for the prevention of falls in older persons. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 49(5), 664–672. - PubMed
    1. Bergen G, Stevens MR, & Burns ER (2016). Falls and fall injuries among adults aged ≥65 years - United States, 2014. MMWR Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 65(37), 993–998. - PubMed
    1. Bergquist R, Weber M, Schwenk M, et al. (2019). Performance-based clinical tests of balance and muscle strength used in young seniors: A systematic literature review. BMC Geriatrics, 19(1), 9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Carpenter CR, Avidan MS, Wildes T, Stark S, Fowler SA, & Lo AX (2014). Predicting geriatric falls following an episode of emergency department care: A systematic review. Academic Emergency Medicine: Official Journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine, 21(10), 1069–1082. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types