Health workers' values and preferences regarding contraceptive methods globally: A systematic review

Abstract

Objective: We sought to systematically review the literature on health workers' values and preferences related to contraceptive methods.

Study design: As part of a larger review, we searched ten electronic databases for published articles from January 1, 2005 through July 27, 2020. We included studies that reported qualitative or quantitative data from the perspective of health workers providing family planning services globally.

Results: Forty-one studies met our inclusion criteria. These studies included 12,643 health workers and were conducted in 27 countries. Health worker values and preferences for contraceptive methods were affected by factors related to contraceptive method characteristics (e.g., bleeding pattern and convenience), the contraceptive user (e.g., medical history, parity), and the health worker themselves (e.g., training, environment). Differences were also noted between various professions/specialties (e.g., comfort level with contraceptive methods, depth of experience). While contraceptive counseling and provision were influenced by health worker values and preferences, they were also affected by health worker misconceptions and biases.

Conclusion: Health worker values and preferences for contraception are affected by the client's history, medical eligibility, and the health worker context. Provision of contraception that is affected by harmful bias towards certain populations or about certain methods can negatively affect patient-centered care. Future work should address knowledge gaps and health worker biases by improving and standardizing education and training globally, to ensure high-quality, rights-based, and patient-centered contraceptive services.

Keywords: Contraception; Health Care providers; Health workers; Preferences; Systematic review.

Fig. 1

PRISMA flow diagram presenting the search and screening process for the global review on contraceptive method values and preferences from the perspective of health workers 2005-2020.

Fig. 2

World map showing location of included studies presenting values and preferences from the perspective of health workers 2005-2020.