Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Mar 30;32(2):569-581.
doi: 10.1007/s40670-022-01509-w. eCollection 2022 Apr.

The Level of Anatomical Knowledge, Hard to Establish: a Systematic Narrative Review

Affiliations
Review

The Level of Anatomical Knowledge, Hard to Establish: a Systematic Narrative Review

Dorothea Maria Koppes et al. Med Sci Educ. .

Abstract

Objective: This literature review aimed to gain more insight into the level of anatomical knowledge based on published measurements among medical students, residents, fellows, and specialists.

Methods: We performed an extensive literature search in three online databases: Medline (using PubMed), Web of Science, and Education Resources Information Centre (ERIC).

Results: A total of 30 relevant studies were found. In these studies, participants took different anatomy tests, and their mean/median scaled scores range from 22.5 to 82.4% on a 0 to 100% scale.

Conclusion: This review provides an overview of what is known about measured anatomical knowledge. After critically reviewing the literature, we have to conclude that the existing literature confirms that anatomical knowledge is hard to establish, mainly due to the lack of standardisation.Further research should focus on ways to define and assess 'desired anatomical knowledge' in different contexts. In a next phase, we can discuss if anatomical knowledge is lacking and if interventions are needed.

Keywords: Anatomy; Knowledge; Scientific perspectives; Test.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of InterestThe authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flowchart of literature search

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Sinclair D. The two anatomies. Lancet. 1975;1:875–878. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(75)91681-5. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Older J. Anatomy: a must for teaching the next generation. The surgeon : journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland. 2004;2(2):79–90. doi: 10.1016/S1479-666X(04)80050-7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Waterston SW, Stewart IJ. Survey of clinicians' attitudes to the anatomical teaching and knowledge of medical students. Clinical anatomy (New York, NY) 2005;18(5):380–384. doi: 10.1002/ca.20101. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cottam WW. Adequacy of medical school gross anatomy education as perceived by certain postgraduate residency programs and anatomy course directors. Clinical anatomy (New York, NY) 1999;12(1):55–65. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2353(1999)12:1<55::AID-CA8>3.0.CO;2-O. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bergman EM, Prince KJ, Drukker J, van der Vleuten CP, Scherpbier AJ. How much anatomy is enough? Anat Sci Educ. 2008;1(4):184–188. doi: 10.1002/ase.35. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources