Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Apr 28:2022:6145755.
doi: 10.1155/2022/6145755. eCollection 2022.

Life Cycle Assessment of Construction and Demolition Waste from Railway Engineering Projects

Affiliations

Life Cycle Assessment of Construction and Demolition Waste from Railway Engineering Projects

Jianling Huang et al. Comput Intell Neurosci. .

Abstract

Railway engineering generates large amounts of construction and demolition waste (CDW). To quantify the amount of CDW generated from railway engineering projects throughout the whole life cycle, a process-based life cycle assessment model is proposed in this paper. The life-cycle CDW is divided into four parts: CDW from off-site transportation of construction materials (OSTCM), CDW from site operation wastage of construction materials (SOWCM), discard ballast from roadbeds, stationyard, bridges and tunnels (DB), and CDW from reparation and renewal of aging components (RRAC). Yun-Gui Railway is selected as a case study to validate the developed model, and an uncertainty analysis is conducted with Oracle Crystal Ball software. The results show that between 175 and 311 million tons of CDW is generated throughout the whole life cycle of Yun-Gui Railway. DB is the largest component of the life-cycle CDW from railway engineering projects. This indicates the negative environmental impacts of railway construction can be significantly mitigated by optimizing the location of ballast disposal sites and developing suitable landfill proposals. Also, the CDW generated by wastage of construction materials during off-site construction and site operation is important in waste management in railway engineering projects, in which rubble, sand, and cement have the high potential for waste reduction. Findings from this study can contribute to the knowledge body as well as the engineering practice in green railways.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

All authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The life-cycle CDW of railway engineering projects.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The life-cycle material flow of railway engineering projects.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Proportion of life-cycle CDW generated from various construction materials.
Figure 4
Figure 4
The possible range of CDW generated from Yun-Gui railway (unit: tons).

Similar articles

References

    1. Jain S., Singhal S., Jain N. K., Bhaskar K. Construction and demolition waste recycling: Investigating the role of theory of planned behavior, institutional pressures and environmental consciousness. Journal of Cleaner Production . 2020;263 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121405.121405 - DOI
    1. Wu Z., Yu A. T. W., Poon C. S. Promoting effective construction and demolition waste management towards sustainable development: A case study of Hong Kong. Sustainable Development . 2020;28(6):1713–1724. doi: 10.1002/sd.2119. - DOI
    1. Wu H., Zuo J., Zillante G., Wang J., Yuan H. Status quo and future directions of construction and demolition waste research: A critical review. Journal of Cleaner Production . 2019;240 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118163.118163 - DOI
    1. Li Y., Zhang X., Ding G., Feng Z. Developing a quantitative construction waste estimation model for building construction projects. Resources, Conservation and Recycling . 2016;106:9–20. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.11.001. - DOI
    1. Rondinel-Oviedo and D. R. Construction and demolition waste management in developing countries: A Diagnosis from 265 construction sites in the Lima Metropolitan area. International Journal of Construction Management . 2021;1-12 doi: 10.1080/15623599.2021.1874677. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources