Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Apr 8;6(2):txac041.
doi: 10.1093/tas/txac041. eCollection 2022 Apr.

Enteric methane mitigation interventions

Affiliations

Enteric methane mitigation interventions

Julia Q Fouts et al. Transl Anim Sci. .

Abstract

Mitigation of enteric methane (CH4) presents a feasible approach to curbing agriculture's contribution to climate change. One intervention for reduction is dietary reformulation, which manipulates the composition of feedstuffs in ruminant diets to redirect fermentation processes toward low CH4 emissions. Examples include reducing the relative proportion of forages to concentrates, determining the rate of digestibility and passage rate from the rumen, and dietary lipid inclusion. Feed additives present another intervention for CH4 abatement and are classified based on their mode of action. Through inhibition of key enzymes, 3-nitrooxypropanol (3-NOP) and halogenated compounds directly target the methanogenesis pathway. Rumen environment modifiers, including nitrates, essential oils, and tannins, act on the conditions that affect methanogens and remove the accessibility of fermentation products needed for CH4 formation. Low CH4-emitting animals can also be directly or indirectly selected through breeding interventions, and genome-wide association studies are expected to provide efficient selection decisions. Overall, dietary reformulation and feed additive inclusion provide immediate and reversible effects, while selective breeding produces lasting, cumulative CH4 emission reductions.

Keywords: enteric methane; mitigation; ruminants.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Considerations for determining the impact of enteric methane (CH4) mitigation interventions on environmental impact categories, including greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (carbon dioxide (CO2) and nitrous oxide (N2O)). Adapted from FAO (2020) .
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Current knowledge gaps of enteric methane mitigation interventions.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abbott, D. W., Aasen I. M., Beauchemin K. A., Grondahl F., Gruninger R., Hayes M., Huws S., Kenny D. A., Krizsan S. J., Kirwan S. F., . et al. 2020. Seaweed and seaweed bioactives for mitigation of enteric methane: challenges and opportunities. Animals. 10(12):2432. doi:10.3390/ani10122432. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aboagye, I. A., and Beauchemin K. A., . 2019. Potential of molecular weight and structure of tannins to reduce methane emissions from ruminants: a review. Animals. 9(11). doi:10.3390/ani9110856. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Agle, M., Hristov A. N., Zaman S., Schneider C., Ndegwa P. M., and Vaddella V. K.. . 2010. Effect of dietary concentrate on rumen fermentation, digestibility, and nitrogen losses in dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 93(9):4211–4222. doi:10.3168/jds.2009-2977. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Aguerre, M. J., Wattiaux M. A., Powell J. M., Broderick G. A., and Arndt C.. . 2011. Effect of forage-to-concentrate ratio in dairy cow diets on emission of methane, carbon dioxide, and ammonia, lactation performance, and manure excretion. J. Dairy Sci. 94(6):3081–3093. doi:10.3168/jds.2010-4011. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Alemu, A. W., Romero-Pérez A., Araujo R. C., and Beauchemin K. A.. . 2019. Effect of encapsulated nitrate and microencapsulated blend of essential oils on growth performance and methane emissions from beef steers fed backgrounding diets. Animals. 9(1). doi:10.3390/ani9010021. - DOI - PMC - PubMed