Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Feb 10;12(2):185-195.
doi: 10.1007/s13534-022-00217-z. eCollection 2022 May.

Towards in vivo neural decoding

Affiliations

Towards in vivo neural decoding

Daniel Valencia et al. Biomed Eng Lett. .

Abstract

Conventional spike sorting and motor intention decoding algorithms are mostly implemented on an external computing device, such as a personal computer. The innovation of high-resolution and high-density electrodes to record the brain's activity at the single neuron level may eliminate the need for spike sorting altogether while potentially enabling in vivo neural decoding. This article explores the feasibility and efficient realization of in vivo decoding, with and without spike sorting. The efficiency of neural network-based models for reliable motor decoding is presented and the performance of candidate neural decoding schemes on sorted single-unit activity and unsorted multi-unit activity are evaluated. A programmable processor with a custom instruction set architecture, for the first time to the best of our knowledge, is designed and implemented for executing neural network operations in a standard 180-nm CMOS process. The processor's layout is estimated to occupy 49 mm 2 of silicon area and to dissipate 12 mW of power from a 1.8 V supply, which is within the tissue-safe operation of the brain.

Keywords: Application-specific integrated circuits; Brain-machine interfaces; Neural decoding.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interestThe authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
a Neuron rate coding and b ensemble rate coding
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
The training and validation loss for neuron rate coding and ensemble rate coding over various training epochs
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
The in vivo neural decoding paradigms
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
a The block diagram of a TCN layer and b the TCN-based decoder
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
a The training performance and b the R2 score of the TCN-based decoder for both decoding paradigms
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
The system-level diagrams of a conventional and b the fully-implantable wireless BMIs
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
The top-level block diagram of the designed and implemented neural network processor
Fig. 8
Fig. 8
The program snippet for computing the dilated convolution
Fig. 9
Fig. 9
The ASIC layout of the designed and implemented neural network processor

References

    1. Owens AL, Denison TJ, Versnel H, Rebbert M, Peckerar M, Shamma SA. Multi-electrode array for measuring evoked potentials from surface of ferret primary auditory cortex. J Neurosci Methods. 1995;58(1–2):209–220. doi: 10.1016/0165-0270(94)00178-J. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Borton DA, Yin M, Aceros J, Nurmikko A. An implantable wireless neural interface for recording cortical circuit dynamics in moving primates. J Neural Eng. 2013;10(2):026010. doi: 10.1088/1741-2560/10/2/026010. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Musk E, et al. An integrated brain–machine interface platform with thousands of channels. J Med Internet Res. 2019;21(10):16194. doi: 10.2196/16194. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Buzsáki G. Large-scale recording of neuronal ensembles. Nat Neurosci. 2004;7(5):446–451. doi: 10.1038/nn1233. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gold C, Henze DA, Koch C, Buzsaki G. On the origin of the extracellular action potential waveform: a modeling study. J Neurophysiol. 2006;95(5):3113–3128. doi: 10.1152/jn.00979.2005. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources